Into the dark night and back. The mystical writings of Jean-Joseph Surin. Edited by Moshe Sluhovsky (trans. Patricia M. Ranum). (Jesuit Studies, 19.) Pp. viii + 548. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2019. €175. 978 90 04 38764 5; 2214 3289

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-670
Author(s):  
Sarah Ferber
Keyword(s):  
Dark Night

The Dark Night of Hope

1985 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-25
Author(s):  
Annette Geoffrion Brownlee
Keyword(s):  
Dark Night

Grazing in the Sunlight: On H. S. Harris's “The Cows in the Dark Night”

Dialogue ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-664
Author(s):  
George di Giovanni
Keyword(s):  
David Hume ◽  
Dark Night ◽  
The Third ◽  
Sound Classification

I have only two comments to make, both of which will appear incidental at first. Their full relevance to the paper you have just read will become clear at the end, as I hope.The first refers to Harris's remark that Jacobi, Schleiermacher and Herder “make strange bedfellows”. Actually, they do not. This is one more example, I believe, of Hegel's usual idiosyncratic yet conceptually sound classification of philosophers and philosophies. I am thinking especially of the Jacobi-Herder pair, but I suspect that what I have to say would apply to the third member of the trio as well. We must remember that, at the time of the writing of the Preface to the Phenomenology, the 1815 edition of Jacobi's dialogue David Hume on Faith, which Jacobi himself had overseen, did not exist. It is the edition that we are most likely to have read, because the wonders of photomechanical reproduction have made it easily available. Hegel, however, could only have read the dialogue in its 1787 edition, without the long new Introduction which Jacobi added in 1815 as an introduction to his collected works as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document