Modelling dynamic and irreversible powder compaction

2010 ◽  
Vol 664 ◽  
pp. 348-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD SAUREL ◽  
N. FAVRIE ◽  
F. PETITPAS ◽  
M.-H. LALLEMAND ◽  
S. L. GAVRILYUK

A multiphase hyperbolic model for dynamic and irreversible powder compaction is built. Four important points have to be addressed in this case. The first one is related to the irreversible character of powder compaction. When a granular media is subjected to a loading–unloading cycle, the final volume is lower than the initial one. To deal with this hysteresis phenomenon, a multiphase model with relaxation is built. During loading, mechanical equilibrium is assumed corresponding to stiff mechanical relaxation, while during unloading non-equilibrium mechanical transformation is assumed. Consequently, the sound speed of the limit models are very different during loading and unloading. These differences in acoustic properties are responsible for irreversibility in the compaction process. The second point is related to dynamic effects, where pressure and shock waves play an important role. Wave dynamics is guaranteed by the hyperbolic character of the equations. Phase compressibility as well as configuration energy are taken into account. The third point is related to multi-dimensional situations that involve material interfaces. Indeed, most processes with powder compaction entail free surfaces. Consequently, the model should be able to solve interfaces separating pure fluids and granular mixtures. Finally, the fourth point is related to gas permeation that may play an important role in some specific powder compaction situations. This poses the difficult question of multiple-velocity description. These four points are considered in a unique model fitting the frame of multiphase theory of diffuse interfaces (Saurel & Abgrall, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 150, 1999, p. 425; Kapila et al., Phys. Fluids, vol. 13, 2001, p. 3002; Saurel et al., J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, 2009, p. 1678). The ability of the model to deal with these various effects is validated on basic situations, where each phenomenon is considered separately. Except for the material EOS (hydrodynamic and granular pressures and energies), which are determined on the basis of separate experiments found in the literature, the model is free of adjustable parameter.

2001 ◽  
Vol 431 ◽  
pp. 239-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD SAUREL ◽  
OLIVIER LEMETAYER

A compressible multiphase unconditionally hyperbolic model is proposed. It is able to deal with a wide range of applications: interfaces between compressible materials, shock waves in condensed multiphase mixtures, homogeneous two-phase flows (bubbly and droplet flows) and cavitation in liquids. Here we focus on the generalization of the formulation to an arbitrary number of fluids, and to mass and energy transfers, and extend the associated Godunov method.We first detail the specific problems involved in the computation of thermodynamic interface variables when dealing with compressible materials separated by well-defined interfaces. We then address one of the major problems in the modelling of detonation waves in condensed energetic materials and propose a way to suppress the mixture equation of state. We then consider another problem of practical importance related to high-pressure liquid injection and associated cavitating flow. This problem involves the dynamic creation of interfaces. We show that the multiphase model is able to solve these very different problems using a unique formulation.We then develop the Godunov method for this model. We show how the non-conservative terms must be discretized in order to fulfil the interface conditions. Numerical resolution of interface conditions and partial equilibrium multiphase mixtures also requires the introduction of infinite relaxation terms. We propose a way to solve them in the context of an arbitrary number of fluids. This is of particular importance for the development of multimaterial reactive hydrocodes. We finally extend the discretization method in the multidimensional case, and show some results and validations of the model and method.


1988 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Bethann Moffet ◽  
Rebekah Pindzola
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1635-1650 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Faivre ◽  
L. David ◽  
J. Perez

1994 ◽  
Vol 04 (C5) ◽  
pp. C5-705-C5-708
Author(s):  
V. PREOBRAZHENSKY ◽  
I. DUBENKO ◽  
N. ECONOMOV ◽  
A. ZAIKIN

1981 ◽  
Vol 42 (C5) ◽  
pp. C5-787-C5-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Koiwa ◽  
S. Ishioka ◽  
G. Cannelli ◽  
R. Cantelli

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 75-78
Author(s):  
Y. K. Meshram Y. K. Meshram ◽  
◽  
K.N.Sonune K.N.Sonune ◽  
Rohinee R Dharamkar

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Srivastava ◽  
◽  
Nitu Yana ◽  
A.K. Gupta ◽  
Y. Srivastava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document