Reynolds number dependence of the small-scale structure of grid turbulence

2000 ◽  
Vol 406 ◽  
pp. 81-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. ZHOU ◽  
R. A. ANTONIA

The small-scale structure of grid turbulence is studied primarily using data obtained with a transverse vorticity (ω3) probe for values of the Taylor-microscale Reynolds number Rλ in the range 27–100. The measured spectra of the transverse vorticity component agree within ±10% with those calculated using the isotropic relation over nearly all wavenumbers. Scaling-range exponents of transverse velocity increments are appreciably smaller than exponents of longitudinal velocity increments. Only a small fraction of this difference can be attributed to the difference in intermittency between the locally averaged energy dissipation rate and enstrophy fluctuations. The anisotropy of turbulence structures in the scaling range, which reflects the small values of Rλ, is more likely to account for most of the difference. All four fourth-order rotational invariants Iα (α = 1 to 4) proposed by Siggia (1981) were evaluated. For any particular value of α, the magnitude of the ratio Iα / I1 is approximately constant, independently of Rλ. The implication is that the invariants are interdependent, at least in isotropic and quasi-Gaussian turbulence, so that only one power-law exponent may be sufficient to describe the Rλ dependence of all fourth-order velocity derivative moments in this type of flow. This contrasts with previous suggestions that at least two power-law exponents are needed, one for the rate of strain and the other for vorticity.

2017 ◽  
Vol 829 ◽  
pp. 31-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Elsinga ◽  
T. Ishihara ◽  
M. V. Goudar ◽  
C. B. da Silva ◽  
J. C. R. Hunt

The scaling of turbulent motions is investigated by considering the flow in the eigenframe of the local strain-rate tensor. The flow patterns in this frame of reference are evaluated using existing direct numerical simulations of homogeneous isotropic turbulence over a Reynolds number range from $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}=34.6$ up to 1131, and also with reference to data for inhomogeneous, anisotropic wall turbulence. The average flow in the eigenframe reveals a shear layer structure containing tube-like vortices and a dissipation sheet, whose dimensions scale with the Kolmogorov length scale, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$. The vorticity stretching motions scale with the Taylor length scale, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{T}$, while the flow outside the shear layer scales with the integral length scale, $L$. Furthermore, the spatial organization of the vortices and the dissipation sheet defines a characteristic small-scale structure. The overall size of this characteristic small-scale structure is $120\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$ in all directions based on the coherence length of the vorticity. This is considerably larger than the typical size of individual vortices, and reflects the importance of spatial organization at the small scales. Comparing the overall size of the characteristic small-scale structure with the largest flow scales and the vorticity stretching motions on the scale of $4\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{T}$ shows that transitions in flow structure occur where $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}\approx 45$ and 250. Below these respective transitional Reynolds numbers, the small-scale motions and the vorticity stretching motions are progressively less well developed. Scale interactions are examined by decomposing the average shear layer into a local flow, which is induced by the shear layer vorticity, and a non-local flow, which represents the environment of the characteristic small-scale structure. The non-local strain is $4\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{T}$ in width and height, which is consistent with observations in high Reynolds number flow of a $4\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{T}$ wide instantaneous shear layer with many $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$-scale vortical structures inside (Ishihara et al., Flow Turbul. Combust., vol. 91, 2013, pp. 895–929). In the average shear layer, vorticity aligns with the intermediate principal strain at small scales, while it aligns with the most stretching principal strain at larger scales, consistent with instantaneous turbulence. The length scale at which the alignment changes depends on the Reynolds number. When conditioning the flow in the eigenframe on extreme dissipation, the velocity is strongly affected over large distances. Moreover, the associated peak velocity remains Reynolds number dependent when normalized by the Kolmogorov velocity scale. It signifies that extreme dissipation is not simply a small-scale property, but is associated with large scales at the same time.


2001 ◽  
Vol 436 ◽  
pp. 231-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. P. ROMANO ◽  
R. A. ANTONIA

The difference between scaling exponents of longitudinal and transverse velocity structure functions in the far-field of a round jet is found to depend on the anisotropy of the flow. The effect of the large-scale anisotropy is assessed by considering different initial conditions at the jet nozzle, and hence different ratios of the longitudinal to transverse rms velocities. The effect of the Taylor microscale Reynolds number on the small scale anisotropy is also considered. Both effects account, to a large extent, for the observed difference between longitudinal and transverse exponents and the disagreement between previously published results of different authors. This disagreement also depends on the method used to determine the inertial range. An empirical description of the overall behaviour of the structure functions provides reasonable estimates for the longitudinal and transverse exponents, accounting reasonably well for the anisotropy of both large- and small-scale motions.


2001 ◽  
Vol 444 ◽  
pp. 343-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. R. PEARSON ◽  
R. A. ANTONIA

The main focus is the Reynolds number dependence of Kolmogorov normalized low-order moments of longitudinal and transverse velocity increments. The velocity increments are obtained in a large number of flows and over a wide range (40–4250) of the Taylor microscale Reynolds number Rλ. The Rλ dependence is examined for values of the separation, r, in the dissipative range, inertial range and in excess of the integral length scale. In each range, the Kolmogorov-normalized moments of longitudinal and transverse velocity increments increase with Rλ. The scaling exponents of both longitudinal and transverse velocity increments increase with Rλ, the increase being more significant for the latter than the former. As Rλ increases, the inequality between scaling exponents of longitudinal and transverse velocity increments diminishes, reflecting a reduced influence from the large-scale anisotropy or the mean shear on inertial range scales. At sufficiently large Rλ, inertial range exponents for the second-order moment of the pressure increment follow more closely those for the fourth-order moments of transverse velocity increments than the fourth-order moments of longitudinal velocity increments. Comparison with DNS data indicates that the magnitude and Rλ dependence of the mean square pressure gradient, based on the joint-Gaussian approximation, is incorrect. The validity of this approximation improves as r increases; when r exceeds the integral length scale, the Rλ dependence of the second-order pressure structure functions is in reasonable agreement with the result originally given by Batchelor (1951).


1988 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 255-256
Author(s):  
A. J. Kemball ◽  
P. J. Diamond ◽  
F. Mantovani

The apparent spot sizes of OH masers appear to be significantly broadened when seen through the inner galaxy or large extents of the galactic disk (Burke 1968). Bowers et al (1980) found evidence of small-scale structure (≲ 50 mas) in OH sources at distances of less than 5 kpc but this was characteristically absent in very distant sources (≳ 8kpc) at galactic longitudes 1 ≲ 40°. This result is typically explained in terms of interstellar scattering (ISS) by intervening diffuse HII regions.


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Poggi ◽  
A. Porporato ◽  
L. Ridolfi

1983 ◽  
Vol 130 (-1) ◽  
pp. 411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc E. Brachet ◽  
Daniel I. Meiron ◽  
Steven A. Orszag ◽  
B. G. Nickel ◽  
Rudolf H. Morf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document