Close interactions between “When” and “Where” in saccade target selection: Multiple saliency and distractor effects

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-694
Author(s):  
Christian Olivers ◽  
Dietmar Heinke ◽  
Glyn Humphreys ◽  
Hermann Müller
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Spatial Selection ◽  
Distractor Effect ◽  
Selection Processes ◽  
Remote Distractor Effect ◽  
Saccade Generation

A model of when and where saccades are made necessarily incorporates a model of the “When” and “Where” of target selection. We suggest that the framework proposed by Findlay & Walker does not specify sufficiently how (and by what means) selection processes contribute to the spatial and temporal determinants of saccade generation. Examples from across-trial priming in visual search and from the inhibition of temporally segmented distractors show linkage between the processes involved in computing when and where selection operates, so that there is cooperation rather than competition between so-called Where and When pathways. Aspects of spatial selection may also determine the remote distractor effect on saccades. The detailed relations between the processes involved in selection and saccade generation may be best understood in relation to detailed computational accounts of the processes.

Dissociating oculomotor contributions to spatial and feature-based selection

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 1525-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donatas Jonikaitis ◽  
Jan Theeuwes
Keyword(s):  
Visual Perception ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Visual Selection ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Perceptual Discrimination ◽  
Spatial Selection ◽  
Feature Based ◽  
Selection Mechanisms ◽  
Saccade Preparation

Saccades not only deliver the high-resolution retinal image requisite for visual perception, but processing stages associated with saccade target selection affect visual perception even before the eye movement starts. These presaccadic effects are thought to arise from two visual selection mechanisms: spatial selection that enhances processing of the saccade target location and feature-based selection that enhances processing of the saccade target features. By measuring oculomotor performance and perceptual discrimination, we determined which selection mechanisms are associated with saccade preparation. We observed both feature-based and space-based selection during saccade preparation but found that feature-based selection was neither related to saccade initiation nor was it affected by simultaneously observed redistribution of spatial selection. We conclude that oculomotor selection biases visual selection only in a spatial, feature-unspecific manner.

scholarly journals Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
NARCISSE P. BICHOT ◽  
JEFFREY D. SCHALL
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Conjunction Search ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Experimental Session ◽  
Shape Information ◽  
Feature Search ◽  
The Individual

To gain insight into how vision guides eye movements, monkeys were trained to make a single saccade to a specified target stimulus during feature and conjunction search with stimuli discriminated by color and shape. Monkeys performed both tasks at levels well above chance. The latencies of saccades to the target in conjunction search exhibited shallow positive slopes as a function of set size, comparable to slopes of reaction time of humans during target present/absent judgments, but significantly different than the slopes in feature search. Properties of the selection process were revealed by the occasional saccades to distractors. During feature search, errant saccades were directed more often to a distractor near the target than to a distractor at any other location. In contrast, during conjunction search, saccades to distractors were guided more by similarity than proximity to the target; monkeys were significantly more likely to shift gaze to a distractor that had one of the target features than to a distractor that had none. Overall, color and shape information were used to similar degrees in the search for the conjunction target. However, in single sessions we observed an increased tendency of saccades to a distractor that had been the target in the previous experimental session. The establishment of this tendency across sessions at least a day apart and its persistence throughout a session distinguish this phenomenon from the short-term (<10 trials) perceptual priming observed in this and earlier studies using feature visual search. Our findings support the hypothesis that the target in at least some conjunction visual searches can be detected efficiently based on visual similarity, most likely through parallel processing of the individual features that define the stimuli. These observations guide the interpretation of neurophysiological data and constrain the development of computational models.

scholarly journals Reversal of a Distractor Effect on Saccade Target Selection After Superior Colliculus Inactivation

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 2694-2702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. McPeek
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Search Array ◽  
Distractor Effect ◽  
Normal Trend ◽  
Winner Take All ◽  
Take All

Recent evidence indicates that inactivation of the primate superior colliculus (SC) results in an increase in saccade target-selection errors. The pattern of errors suggests that a winner-take-all competition selects the saccade goal and that SC inactivation perturbs this process by biasing the competition against stimuli in the inactivated field. To investigate this idea, the difficulty of target selection was manipulated in a color-oddity search task by varying the number of homogeneous distractors in the search array. Previous studies have shown that target selection is easier when a greater number of homogeneous distractors is present, due to perceptual grouping of the distractors. These results were replicated when testing with the SC intact. Surprisingly, during SC inactivation, this normal trend was reversed: target-selection performance declined significantly with more distractors, resulting in a greater proportion of errant saccades to distractors. Examination of the saccade endpoints indicates that after SC inactivation, many errant saccades were directed to distractors adjacent to the target. This pattern of results suggests that the salience signal used by the SC for target selection is relatively broad in spatial scope. As a result, when the area of the SC representing the target location is inactivated, distractors near the target are at a competitive advantage relative to more distant distractors and, consequently, are selected more often as the saccade goal. This contributes to the trend of worse performance with more distractors due to the greater proximity of distractors to the target.

scholarly journals Saccade target selection in visual search: the effect of information from the previous fixation

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M Findlay ◽  
Valerie Brown ◽  
Iain D Gilchrist
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Saccade Target

scholarly journals Frontal Eye Field Activity Before Visual Search Errors Reveals the Integration of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Salience

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 337-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk G. Thompson ◽  
Narcisse P. Bichot ◽  
Takashi R. Sato
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Singleton Search ◽  
Eye Field

We investigated the saccade decision process by examining activity recorded in the frontal eye field (FEF) of monkeys performing 2 separate visual search experiments in which there were errors in saccade target choice. In the first experiment, the difficulty of a singleton search task was manipulated by varying the similarity between the target and distractors; errors were made more often when the distractors were similar to the target. On catch trials in which the target was absent the monkeys occasionally made false alarm errors by shifting gaze to one of the distractors. The second experiment was a popout color visual search task in which the target and distractor colors switched unpredictably across trials. Errors occurred most frequently on the first trial after the switch and less often on subsequent trials. In both experiments, FEF neurons selected the saccade goal on error trials, not the singleton target of the search array. Although saccades were made to the same stimulus locations, presaccadic activation and the magnitude of selection differed across trial conditions. The variation in presaccadic selective activity was accounted for by the variation in saccade probability across the stimulus–response conditions, but not by variations in saccade metrics. These results suggest that FEF serves as a saccade probability map derived from the combination of bottom-up and top-down influences. Peaks on this map represent the behavioral relevance of each item in the visual field rather than just reflecting saccade preparation. This map in FEF may correspond to the theoretical salience map of many models of attention and saccade target selection.

scholarly journals Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search

1997 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 617-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN M. FINDLAY
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Saccade Target

Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search

Nature ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 366 (6454) ◽  
pp. 467-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Schall ◽  
Doug P. Hanes
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Eye Field

scholarly journals Sequential Operations Revealed by Serendipitous Feature Selectivity in Frontal Eye Field

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaleb A. Lowe ◽  
Jeffrey D. Schall
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Visual Search Task ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Stimulus Orientation ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Feature Selectivity ◽  
Selection Indexes

ABSTRACTNeurons in macaque frontal eye field contribute to spatial but typically not feature selection during visual search. Using an innovative visual search task, we report a serendipitous discovery that some frontal eye field neurons can develop rapid selectivity for stimulus orientation that is used to guide gaze during a visual search task with pro-saccade and anti-saccade responses. This feature selectivity occurs simultaneously at multiple locations for all objects sharing that feature and coincides with when neurons select the singleton of a search array. This feature selectivity also reveals the distinct, subsequent operation of selecting the endpoint of the saccade in pro-saccade as well as anti-saccade trials. These results demonstrate that target selection preceding saccade preparation is composed of multiple operations. We conjecture that singleton selection indexes the allocation of attention, which can be divided, to conspicuous items. Consequently, endpoint selection indexes the focused allocation of attention to the endpoint of the saccade. These results demonstrate that saccade target selection is not a unitary process.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTFrontal eye field is well known to contribute to spatial selection for attention and eye movements. We discovered that some frontal eye field neurons can acquire selectivity for stimulus orientation when it guides visual search. The chronometry of neurons with and without feature selectivity reveal distinct operations accomplishing visual search.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document