Neural Correlates of Predictive Saccades

Every day we generate motor responses that are timed with external cues. This phenomenon of sensorimotor synchronization has been simplified and studied extensively using finger tapping sequences that are executed in synchrony with auditory stimuli. The predictive saccade paradigm closely resembles the finger tapping task. In this paradigm, participants follow a visual target that “steps” between two fixed locations on a visual screen at predictable ISIs. Eventually, the time from target appearance to saccade initiation (i.e., saccadic RT) becomes predictive with values nearing 0 msec. Unlike the finger tapping literature, neural control of predictive behavior described within the eye movement literature has not been well established and is inconsistent, especially between neuroimaging and patient lesion studies. To resolve these discrepancies, we used fMRI to investigate the neural correlates of predictive saccades by contrasting brain areas involved with behavior generated from the predictive saccade task with behavior generated from a reactive saccade task (saccades are generated toward targets that are unpredictably timed). We observed striking differences in neural recruitment between reactive and predictive conditions: Reactive saccades recruited oculomotor structures, as predicted, whereas predictive saccades recruited brain structures that support timing in motor responses, such as the crus I of the cerebellum, and structures commonly associated with the default mode network. Therefore, our results were more consistent with those found in the finger tapping literature.

Saccades Exhibit Abrupt Transition Between Reactive and Predictive, Predictive Saccade Sequences Have Long-Term Correlations

To compensate for neural delays, organisms require predictive motor control. We investigated the transition between reaction and prediction in saccades (rapid eye movements) to periodically paced targets. Tracking at low frequencies (0.2–0.3 Hz) is reactive (eyes lag target) and at high frequencies (0.9–1.0 Hz) is predictive (eyes anticipate target); there is an abrupt rather than smooth transition between the two modes (a “phase transition,” as found in bistable physical systems). These behaviors represent stable modes of the oculomotor control system, with attendant rapid switching between the neural pathways underlying the different modes. Furthermore, predictive saccades exhibit long-term correlations (slow decay of the autocorrelation function, manifest as a 1/ f α spectrum). This indicates that predictive trials are not independent. The findings have implications for the understanding of predictive motor control: predictive performance during a given trial is influenced by a feedback process that takes into account the latency of previous trials.