scholarly journals Artificial Disc Insertion Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwynedd E. Pickett ◽  
Neil Duggal
Keyword(s):  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Complete Relief ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Functional Spinal Unit ◽  
Cervical Disc Prosthesis

Objective and importance:Fusion following anterior cervical discectomy has been implicated in the acceleration of degenerative changes in the adjacent spinal segments. Discectomy followed by implantation of an artificial cervical disc maintains the functionality of the spinal unit, while still providing excellent symptomatic relief. We describe our preliminary experience with implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc System in two cases of single-level cervical disc herniation.Clinical presentation:Two male patients presented with a left C6 radiculopathy, without evidence of myelopathy. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a disc herniation at C5-6 in both cases. Pre-operative flexion and extension radiographs demonstrated preserved motion at the involved levels.Intervention/technique:Following a standard anterior cervical decompression, precision drilling of the vertebral endplates was carried out using a drill attached to a bed-mounted, gravitationally-referenced retraction frame. An artificial cervical disc, composed of a polyurethane nucleus with titanium endplates, was fitted between the contoured endplates without fixation to the vertebral bodies. No complications were experienced during the insertion of the prosthesis, or in the postoperative course. Both patients experienced immediate postoperative resolution of their radicular pain and were discharged from hospital the following day. At nine months following surgery, both patients continue to have complete relief of radicular symptoms. Postoperative radiographs at six months following surgery confirm accurate placement of the prosthesis and preserved mobility of the functional spinal unit.Conclusion:Insertion of the Bryan artificial cervical disc prosthesis following anterior cervical discectomy is a relatively straightforward procedure, which appears to be safe and provides good clinical results, without requiring additional surgical time. Long-term follow-up is required to assess its safety, efficacy, and ability to prevent adjacent segment degeneration.

scholarly journals Surgery in cervical disc herniation: anterior cervical discectomy without fusion or with fusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
Andrei Stefan Iencean
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Small Degree ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc Herniation ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Anteroposterior Translation

Abstract The study included a group of anterior cervical microdiscectomy without fusion performed at one level (either C5-C6 level or at the C6-C7 level) and a second group of patients with same single-level of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. The kinematic analysis included the range of motion, anteroposterior translation and disc height assessed for the cervical functional spinal units at the operated level and adjacent levels. At the operated level the range of motion and the translation were minimal in the anterior cervical discectomy without fusion group, both for the C5-C6 and C6-C7 levels, and absent in the cervical discectomy with fusion group. The superior adjacent levels translations were greater in the ACDF group compared with the ACD group. The clinical results of both types of cervical discectomy were comparable. In cervical microdiscectomy without fusion the elastic fibrous intradiscal scar at the operated level allows a small degree of mobility and the adjacent cervical levels are not overstressed. No need for anterior cervical discectomy with fusion to trait a single level cervical disc herniation than in selected cases.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Yu ◽  
Jiu-Ping Wu ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Hai-Chi Yu ◽  
Qin-Yi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Cervical Disc Herniation ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopy

Abstract Background Posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy (p-PECD) is an effective strategy for the treatment of cervical diseases, with a working cannula ranging from 3.7 mm to 6.9 mm in diameter. However, to date, no studies have been performed to compare the clinical outcomes of the use of endoscopes with different diameters in cervical disc herniation (CDH) patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with unilateral CDH treated with p-PECD using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope. Methods From January 2016 to June 2018, a total of 28 consecutive patients with single-level CDH who received p-PECD using either the 3.7 mm or the 6.9 mm endoscope were enrolled. The clinical results, including the surgical duration, hospitalization, visual analog scale (VAS) score and modified MacNab criteria, were evaluated. Cervical fluoroscopy, CT, and MRI were also performed during follow-up. Results Tthere was a significant difference in regard to the average identification time of the “V” point (18.608 ± 3.7607 min vs. 11.256 ± 2.7161 min, p < 0.001) and the mean removal time of the overlying tissue (16.650 ± 4.1730 min vs. 12.712 ± 3.3079 min, p < 0.05) for the use of the 3.7 mm endoscope and the 6.9 mm endoscope, respectively. The postoperative VAS and MacNab scores of the two endoscopes were significantly improved compared with those the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion The application of both the 3.7 mm endoscope and 6.9 mm endoscope represent an effective method for the treatment of CDH in selected patients, and no significant difference can be observed in the clinical outcomes of the endoscopes. The 6.9 mm endoscope shows superiority to the 3.7 mm endoscope in terms of the efficiency of “V” point identification, the removal of overlying soft tissue and the prevention of spinal cord injury. However, the 6.9 mm endoscope may be inferior to the 3.7 mm endoscope in regards to anterior foraminal decompression due to its large diameter; this result needs to be further evaluated with the support of a large number of randomized controlled trials.

Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion by endoscopic approach: a preliminary report

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangwei Tan ◽  
Yanping Zheng ◽  
Liangtai Gong ◽  
Xinyu Liu ◽  
Jianmin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Postoperative Hemorrhage ◽  
Endoscopic Approach ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc Herniation ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy

Object The authors report the short-term results of anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion performed via an endoscopic approach. Methods Thirty-six patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) performed using endoscopic surgery were selected for this study. The indications for surgery were cervical disc herniation caused by neck injury, spondylotic myelopathy, cervical radiculopathy, and solitary ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The involved levels included C3–4, C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7. The working channel was inserted through a 20-mm transverse incision, the protruding discs or area of OPLL were excised for complete decompression, and then an appropriate intervertebral polyetheretherketone fusion cage was implanted. Results The time spent in surgery was 120 minutes on average (range 50–150 minutes), and the mean blood loss was 55 ml (range 20–140 ml). There were no intraoperative complications and no symptoms of irritation in the laryngopharynx after surgery. However, postoperative hemorrhage of the incision occurred in 1 case. The follow-up period ranged from 26–50 months (mean 38.5 months). Postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association and visual analog scale scores improved significantly. Conclusions Endoscopic surgery for ACDF can produce satisfactory results in patients with cervical disc herniation, cervical myelopathy, or radiculopathy. The optimal levels for this procedure are C4–5 and C5–6. Compared with a traditional approach, this technique has great advantages in terms of cosmetic results, intraoperative visualization, and postoperative recovery course. Nevertheless, every precaution should be taken to avoid possible complications, such as postoperative hemorrhage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document