Intermediate care

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Thompson ◽  
P Crome

The proportion of older people in our society is increasing more rapidly than any other section of the population. This group uses health and social services more than the young do and this is reflected in the NHS and social service budgets from recent years. For example, 40% of the NHS budget was spent on patients over 65 years in 1998. The much-heralded National Service Framework (NSF) for Older People, recently published by the Department of Health in England, was therefore awaited with much anticipation by all sections of the community concerned with older people’s health. This document is described as the ‘key vehicle for ensuring that the needs of older people are at the heart of the government’s reform programme for health and social services’. It has as its first and fundamental standard ‘rooting out age discrimination’. The sections on prevention and treatment of stroke, general hospital care, the management of falls and mental health have been generally well received and when implemented fully are likely to be beneficial to older people. Some areas such as the treatment of care home residents have not been addressed in nearly enough detail. In contrast, one particular section, that on ‘Intermediate Care’, has been heavily criticized, including a fierce attack by two of the United Kingdom’s leading geriatricians.

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Gentles ◽  
J Potter

The National Bed Inquiry indicated that up to 20% of older people might be inappropriately occupying acute hospital beds and could be discharged if alternative services were available. The report proposed the concept of ‘Intermediate Care’ as a scenario that might contribute to resolving issues around the use of acute hospital beds. The Department of Health (DoH) Circular to Health Authorities and Local Councils with regard to Intermediate Care and the publication of the National Service Framework for Older People have brought intermediate care into mainstream health policy.


Author(s):  
Lesley K Bowker ◽  
James D Price ◽  
Sarah C Smith

Using geriatric services 14 Acute services for older people 16 The older patient in intensive care 17 The great integration debate 18 Admission avoidance schemes 20 Day hospitals 22 Specialty clinics 24 Intermediate care 26 The National Service Framework for Older People 28 Community hospitals ...


2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 849-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAN REED ◽  
MARGARET COOK ◽  
GLENDA COOK ◽  
PAMELA INGLIS ◽  
CHARLOTTE CLARKE

This paper reports findings of a study in 2004 of the development of specialist services for older people in the National Health Service (NHS) in England, as recommended in the Department of Health's National Service Framework for Older People (NSF-OP). The study was funded by the Department of Health as part of a programme of research to explore the Framework's implementation. Information was collected through a questionnaire survey about the nature of specialist developments at three levels of the NHS: strategic health authorities (SHAs), provider Trusts, and service units. This produced an overview of developments and a frame from which to select detailed case studies. Analysis of the survey data showed that there were variations in the way that the NSF-OP was being interpreted and implemented. In particular, there was inconsistency in the interpretation of the NSF-OP's anti-ageism standard; some concluded that the strategy discouraged services exclusively for older people, others that it encouraged dedicated provision for them. The tension between creating age-blind and age-defined services was played out in the context of existing service structures, which had been shaped over decades by many local and national influences. These conceptual and historical factors need to be taken into account if services are to change, as developments are shaped by ‘bottom-up’ local processes as well as ‘top-down’ policy initiatives. In particular, the tension inherent in the NSF-OP between negative and positive ageism, and its varied interpretations at local levels needs to be taken into account when evaluating progress in implementation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Thornicroft

The National Service Framework for Mental Health (NSF–MH) is a strategic blueprint for services for adults of working age for the next 10 years. It is both mandatory, in being a clear statement of what services must seek to achieve in relation to the given standards and performance indicators, and permissive, in that it allows considerable local flexibility to customise the services which need to be provided to fit the framework. This paper summarises the process by which the NSF was created, and its content, which became clear when it was published on 30 September 1999 (Department of Health, 1999).


2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 403-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Thornicroft ◽  
Jonathan Bindman ◽  
David Goldberg ◽  
Kevin Gournay ◽  
Peter Huxley

The purpose of this paper is to identify the important gaps in research coverage, particularly in areas key to the National Service Framework for Mental Health (NSF-MH) (Department of Health, 1999) and the NHS Plan (Department of Health, 2000), and to translate these gaps into researchable questions, with a view to developing a potential research agenda for consideration by research funders.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Tucker ◽  
Robert Baldwin ◽  
Jane Hughes ◽  
Susan Benbow ◽  
Andrew Barker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document