scholarly journals Linearity, session types and the Pi calculus

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARCO GIUNTI ◽  
VASCO THUDICHUM VASCONCELOS
Keyword(s):  
Communication Channel ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Completeness Result ◽  
Pi Calculus

We present a type system based on session types that works on a conventional pi calculus. Types are equipped with a constructor that describes the two ends of a single communication channel, this being the only type available for describing the behaviour of channels. Session types, in turn, describe the behaviour of each individual channel end, as usual. A novel notion of typing context split allows for typing processes not typable with extant type systems. We show that our system guarantees that typed processes do not engage in races for linear resources. We assess the expressiveness of the type system by providing three distinct encodings – from the pi calculus with polarized variables, from the pi calculus with accept and request primitives, and from the linear pi calculus – into our system. For each language we present operational and typing correspondences, showing that our system effectively subsumes foregoing works on linear and session types. In the case of the linear pi calculus we also provide a completeness result.

scholarly journals Session Coalgebras: A Coalgebraic View on Session Types and Communication Protocols

2021 ◽  
pp. 375-403
Author(s):  
Alex C. Keizer ◽  
Henning Basold ◽  
Jorge A. Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Communication Protocols ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Software Systems ◽  
Compositional Techniques ◽  
Behavioural Type ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Session Type ◽  
Coalgebra Structure ◽  
Large Systems

AbstractCompositional methods are central to the development and verification of software systems. They allow breaking down large systems into smaller components, while enabling reasoning about the behaviour of the composed system. For concurrent and communicating systems, compositional techniques based on behavioural type systems have received much attention. By abstracting communication protocols as types, these type systems can statically check that programs interact with channels according to a certain protocol, whether the intended messages are exchanged in a certain order. In this paper, we put on our coalgebraic spectacles to investigate session types, a widely studied class of behavioural type systems. We provide a syntax-free description of session-based concurrency as states of coalgebras. As a result, we rediscover type equivalence, duality, and subtyping relations in terms of canonical coinductive presentations. In turn, this coinductive presentation makes it possible to elegantly derive a decidable type system with subtyping for $$\pi $$ π -calculus processes, in which the states of a coalgebra will serve as channel protocols. Going full circle, we exhibit a coalgebra structure on an existing session type system, and show that the relations and type system resulting from our coalgebraic perspective agree with the existing ones.

scholarly journals Gradual session types

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
ATSUSHI IGARASHI ◽  
PETER THIEMANN ◽  
YUYA TSUDA ◽  
VASCO T. VASCONCELOS ◽  
PHILIP WADLER
Keyword(s):  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Seamless Transition ◽  
Linear Types ◽  
Gradual Typing ◽  
Session Type ◽  
Dynamic Typing

Abstract Session types are a rich type discipline, based on linear types, that lifts the sort of safety claims that come with type systems to communications. However, web-based applications and microservices are often written in a mix of languages, with type disciplines in a spectrum between static and dynamic typing. Gradual session types address this mixed setting by providing a framework which grants seamless transition between statically typed handling of sessions and any required degree of dynamic typing. We propose Gradual GV as a gradually typed extension of the functional session type system GV. Following a standard framework of gradual typing, Gradual GV consists of an external language, which relaxes the type system of GV using dynamic types; an internal language with casts, for which operational semantics is given; and a cast-insertion translation from the former to the latter. We demonstrate type and communication safety as well as blame safety, thus extending previous results to functional languages with session-based communication. The interplay of linearity and dynamic types requires a novel approach to specifying the dynamics of the language.

Linear logic propositions as session types

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUÍS CAIRES ◽  
FRANK PFENNING ◽  
BERNARDO TONINHO
Keyword(s):  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Linear Logic ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Deadlock Freedom ◽  
Session Type ◽  
Π Calculus ◽  
Intuitionistic Linear Logic

Throughout the years, several typing disciplines for the π-calculus have been proposed. Arguably, the most widespread of these typing disciplines consists of session types. Session types describe the input/output behaviour of processes and traditionally provide strong guarantees about this behaviour (i.e. deadlock-freedom and fidelity). While these systems exploit a fundamental notion of linearity, the precise connection between linear logic and session types has not been well understood.This paper proposes a type system for the π-calculus that corresponds to a standard sequent calculus presentation of intuitionistic linear logic, interpreting linear propositions as session types and thus providing a purely logical account of all key features and properties of session types. We show the deep correspondence between linear logic and session types by exhibiting a tight operational correspondence between cut-elimination steps and process reductions. We also discuss an alternative presentation of linear session types based on classical linear logic, and compare our development with other more traditional session type systems.

A system of constructor classes: overloading and implicit higher-order polymorphism

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Natural Generalization ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Functional Language ◽  
Effective Algorithm ◽  
Prototype Implementation ◽  
Type Classes

AbstractThis paper describes a flexible type system that combines overloading and higher-order polymorphism in an implicitly typed language using a system of constructor classes—a natural generalization of type classes in Haskell. We present a range of examples to demonstrate the usefulness of such a system. In particular, we show how constructor classes can be used to support the use of monads in a functional language. The underlying type system permits higher-order polymorphism but retains many of the attractive features that have made Hindley/Milner type systems so popular. In particular, there is an effective algorithm that can be used to calculate principal types without the need for explicit type or kind annotations. A prototype implementation has been developed providing, amongst other things, the first concrete implementation of monad comprehensions known to us at the time of writing.

scholarly journals Automating Proof Steps of Progress Proofs: Comparing Vampire and Dafny

10.29007/5zjp ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Grewe ◽  
Sebastian Erdweg ◽  
Mira Mezini
Keyword(s):  
Formal Methods ◽  
Programming Language ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Domain Specific Languages ◽  
Smt Solver ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Efficient Type

\noindent Developing provably sound type systems is a non-trivial task which, as of today, typically requires expert skills in formal methods and a considerable amount of time. Our Veritas~\cite{GreweErdwegWittmannMezini15} project aims at providing support for the development of soundness proofs of type systems and efficient type checker implementations from specifications of type systems. To this end, we investigate how to best automate typical steps within type soundness proofs.\noindent In this paper, we focus on progress proofs for type systems of domain-specific languages. As a running example for such a type system, we model a subset SQL and augment it with a type system. We compare two different approaches for automating proof steps of the progress proofs for this type system against each other: firstly, our own tool Veritas, which translates proof goals and specifications automatically to TPTP~\cite{Sutcliffe98} and calls Vampire~\cite{KovacsV13} on them, and secondly, the programming language Dafny~\cite{Leino2010}, which translates proof goals and specifications to the intermediate verification language Boogie 2~\cite{Leino2008} and calls the SMT solver Z3~\cite{DeMoura2008} on them. We find that Vampire and Dafny are equally well-suited for automatically proving simple steps within progress proofs.

How to evaluate the performance of gradual type systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
BEN GREENMAN ◽  
ASUMU TAKIKAWA ◽  
MAX S. NEW ◽  
DANIEL FELTEY ◽  
ROBERT BRUCE FINDLER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Relative Performance ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Gradual Typing ◽  
The Absolute

Abstract A sound gradual type system ensures that untyped components of a program can never break the guarantees of statically typed components. This assurance relies on runtime checks, which in turn impose performance overhead in proportion to the frequency and nature of interaction between typed and untyped components. The literature on gradual typing lacks rigorous descriptions of methods for measuring the performance of gradual type systems. This gap has consequences for the implementors of gradual type systems and developers who use such systems. Without systematic evaluation of mixed-typed programs, implementors cannot precisely determine how improvements to a gradual type system affect performance. Developers cannot predict whether adding types to part of a program will significantly degrade (or improve) its performance. This paper presents the first method for evaluating the performance of sound gradual type systems. The method quantifies both the absolute performance of a gradual type system and the relative performance of two implementations of the same gradual type system. To validate the method, the paper reports on its application to 20 programs and 3 implementations of Typed Racket.

Type Inference for Session Types in the $$\pi $$ -calculus

2016 ◽  
pp. 103-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Fajstrup Graversen ◽  
Jacob Buchreitz Harbo ◽  
Hans Hüttel ◽  
Mathias Ormstrup Bjerregaard ◽  
Niels Sonnich Poulsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type Inference ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Pi Calculus

scholarly journals Pure Type System conversion is always typable

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
VINCENT SILES ◽  
HUGO HERBELIN
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Positive Answer ◽  
General Question ◽  
Pure Type ◽  
Typing System ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Pure Type Systems

AbstractPure Type Systems are usually described in two different ways, one that uses an external notion of computation like beta-reduction, and one that relies on a typed judgment of equality, directly in the typing system. For a long time, the question was open to know whether both presentations described the same theory. A first step towards this equivalence has been made by Adams for a particular class ofPure Type Systems(PTS) called functional. Then, his result has been relaxed to all semi-full PTSs in previous work. In this paper, we finally give a positive answer to the general question, and prove that equivalence holds for any Pure Type System.

Introduction to the Special Issue on Dependent Type Theory Meets Practical Programming

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
GILLES BARTHE ◽  
PETER DYBJEN ◽  
PETER THIEMANN
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type Theory ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Dependent Type Theory ◽  
Dependent Type

Modern programming languages rely on advanced type systems that detect errors at compile-time. While the benefits of type systems have long been recognized, there are some areas where the standard systems in programming languages are not expressive enough. Language designers usually trade expressiveness for decidability of the type system. Some interesting programs will always be rejected (despite their semantical soundness) or be assigned uninformative types.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document