Surgical management for cardiovascular lesions in Kawasaki disease

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soichiro Kitamura
Keyword(s):  
Kawasaki Disease ◽  
Internal Thoracic Artery ◽  
Myocardial Revascularization ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Obstructive Disease ◽  
Results Of Surgery

SummarySummary Myocardial revascularization is now an accepted therapeutic modality for severe coronary arterial obstructive disease produced by Kawasaki disease which is amenable to usual medical treatment. The mortality rate of myocardial infarction is surprisingly high in this setting, and surgery may be able to prevent many of these deaths. This article focuses on current issues in surgical treatment of ischemic heart disease in children secondary to Kawasaki disease. Coronary arterial obstructive disease is, apparently, a leading problem followed by valvar and myocardial involvements. Introduction of bypass grafting using the internal thoracic artery in children was a major recent advance, because this graft has an excellent capability to adapt to the increments of increased flow and growth of the patient. The saphenous vein is less satisfactory when used as a graft in terms of its long-term patency, particularly in young children less than 8 years old. Although longer follow-up is certainly required, the current results of surgery have been excellent in improving myocardial perfusion, in ameliorating symptoms, and improving the quality of life.

Coronary-coronary bypass grafting: artery or vein?

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 316-321
Author(s):  
Vladlen Bazylev ◽  
Evgeny Rosseikin ◽  
Dmitriy Tungusov ◽  
Artur Mikulyak
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Revascularization ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Bypass Grafts ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Observation Period

Background The method of coronary-coronary bypass grafting was described in 1987 but has not been widely used, and there are only a few studies that report good short-term and mid-term results as well as some individual cases of long-term follow-up. In our medical institution, we carried out an analysis of the long-term results of coronary-coronary bypass grafting, which are presented in this study. Methods This was a retrospective single-center study on 95 patients who underwent coronary-coronary bypass grafting as a supplement to the standard coronary bypass grafting procedure. All patients underwent angiographic assessment of the coronary bypass grafts during the long-term follow-up period. The observation period was up to 123 months. Angiographic assessment of 109 coronary-coronary grafts was carried out. Results Twelve (7.6%) arterial and 11 (19.3%) venous conduits were found to be occluded, and 8 (10.3%) arterial and 10 (31.3%) venous coronary-coronary grafts were occluded during the observation period. Conclusion Arterial coronary-coronary artery bypass grafting represents an alternative technique that allows complete myocardial revascularization.

scholarly journals Can double internal thoracic artery grafts affect 10-year outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Barili ◽  
P D'Errigo ◽  
S Rosato ◽  
F Biancari ◽  
M D'Ovidio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Internal Thoracic Artery ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention

Abstract Background The advantages of the employment of double internal thoracic artery grafts (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting have been recently questioned and no data on long-term follow-up are available. This observational retrospective cohort study was designed by the PRIORITY planning committee to evaluate 10-year follow-up of isolated CABG performed with and without BITA in order to clarify and consolidate the contrasting literature. Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event distributions were separately analyzed accordingly to primary event-type (death, MACEs), using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG that were divided into development and validation datasets; double thoracic internal artery grafts was employed in 24.6%. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, BITA was significantly associated with better survival (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76–0.95, p=0.003). Moreover, the employment of BITA reduced the incidence of MACEs at follow-up (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.94, p=0.001). In details, BITA was demonstrated to be a protective factor for acute myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71–0.99, p=0.05) and for rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI; adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.96, p=0.013). Conclusions The employment of double internal thoracic artery grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated to survival advantage at 10-year. Moreover, it significantly decreased the incidence of acute myocardial infarction and rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Minister of Health

Abstract 16420: Double Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts are Associated to Better 10-year Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Barili ◽  
Paola DErrigo ◽  
Stefano Rosato ◽  
Mariangela D'Ovidio ◽  
Fausto Biancari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Internal Thoracic Artery ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Artery Bypass Grafting

Introduction: Few data on long-term follow-up of effectiveness and advantages related to the employ of double internal thoracic artery grafts (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting are available and the advantage of the employ of BITA have been recently questioned. Hypothesis: This observational cohort study was designed by the PRIORITY planning committee to evaluate 10-year follow-up of isolated CABG performed with and without BITA in order to evaluate the impact of BITA on long-term outcomes. Methods: The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002-2004 and 2007-2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. The primary endpoints were death and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at follow-up. Time-to-event data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression. Models generation was performed on the full dataset and the validation was performed with Montecarlo simulations. Results: The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG; double thoracic internal artery grafts was employed in 23.5%. The median follow-up time was 7.9 years (interquartile range 7.4 - 10 years). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, BITA was significantly associated with better survival (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.73-0.89, p < 0.001). Moreover, the employment of BITA reduced the incidence of MACEs at follow-up (adjusted HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.77-0.89, p < 0.001). In details, BITA was demonstrated to be a protective factor for acute myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.72-0.96, p = 0.001) and for rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI; adjusted HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.63-0.84, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The employment of double internal thoracic artery grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated to significant survival advantage at long-term. Moreover, it is a protective factor for acute myocardial infarction and rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention, reducing the hazard by 28%.

14-Year Results of Bilateral versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts for Left-Sided Myocardial Revascularization in Young Diabetic Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (04) ◽  
pp. 272-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alem Delalic ◽  
Edgar Eszlari ◽  
Walter Eichinger ◽  
Brigitte Gansera
Keyword(s):  
Internal Thoracic Artery ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Myocardial Revascularization ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Deep Sternal Wound Infection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Increased Risk

Objectives Despite encouraging late outcomes, the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting for myocardial revascularization in diabetic patients remains controversial because of an increased risk of sternal wound complications. In the present study, early- and long-term outcomes of the use of left-sided BITA versus single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting in young (< 65 years of age) diabetic patients were reviewed retrospectively. Methods A total of 250 propensity score pair-matched diabetic patients, operated on between February 2000 and December 2011, receiving either BITA (n = 125) or SITA (n = 125) grafting were analyzed retrospectively. In each group, 104 patients were males, and mean age was 60.1 ± 5.3 years. Follow-up was 2.1 to 14.8 years (mean, 9.3 ± 3.5 years) and complete for 100%. Results Incidence of deep sternal wound infection was 2.4 versus 3.2% (p = 0.722). Rethoracotomy due to bleeding occurred in 4.8 versus 3.2% (p = 0.608). The 5-, 10-, and 14-year estimates of survival were 93.4, 76.6, and 67.5% (BITA) versus 89.5, 81.5, and 32.8% (SITA); p = 0.288. Freedom from reangiography/intervention (60.5 vs. 63.9%) during follow-up was comparable (p = 0.507) as well as infarction rate (93.8 vs. 95.1%, p = 0.833) and redoes (p = 0.672, exclusively valve surgery) were comparable. Freedom from thromboembolic or cerebrovascular events did not show any significant differences (94.0 vs. 94.0%, p = 0.78). Multivariate analysis identified poor ejection fraction as predictor for decreased long-term survival. Neither age nor gender or urgency had an influence on long-term mortality. Conclusion Left-sided BITA grafting may be performed routinely even in diabetic patients without increased incidence of postoperative wound-healing complications. Survival rates after 5, 10, and 14 years were comparable for BITA and SITA grafting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document