Sofie Møller , Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020 Pp. xii + 198 ISBN 9781108498494 (hbk) $99.99

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Kate Moran
Keyword(s):  
Pure Reason ◽  
Critique Of Pure Reason ◽  
Cambridge University

God and the Structure of the Transcendental Dialectic: On Willaschek’s Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Guyer
Keyword(s):  
Pure Reason ◽  
Critique Of Pure Reason ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
The Third ◽  
Idea Of God

AbstractMarcus Willaschek’s new book Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason (Cambridge University Press, 2018) is a penetrating analysis of the Transcendental Dialectic of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. In his comments, the author first raises some questions concerning the structure of the Transcendental Dialectic (and Willaschek’s reconstruction of it) and then proposes that looking at the second Critique and continuing on into the third Critique will reveal more roles for the idea of God in Kant’s reconstruction of traditional metaphysics than Willaschek’s treatment suggests.

scholarly journals Sofie Møller: Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 394
Author(s):  
Jacinto Páez Bonifaci
Keyword(s):  
Pure Reason ◽  
Critique Of Pure Reason ◽  
Cambridge University

Reseña: Sofie Møller: Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020, 198 pp. ISBN: 978-1-108- 49849-4

Critique of pure reason.

1899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immanuel Kant
Keyword(s):  
Pure Reason ◽  
Critique Of Pure Reason

Kants kritische Psychologie als Aufklärung

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-273
Author(s):  
Hyeongjoo Kim ◽  
Carina Pape
Keyword(s):  
Important Change ◽  
Pure Reason ◽  
Human Soul ◽  
Critique Of Pure Reason ◽  
Ongoing Process ◽  
The Enlightenment ◽  
Complete Rejection ◽  
Age Of Enlightenment

In his famous essay from 1784, Kant denied that we "live in an enlightened age"; yet he claimed that we "live in an age of enlightenment". If we should answer the question if we live in an enlightened age now, we could basically give the same answer. The enlightenment as an ongoing process can be found throughout Kant's whole work. This article focuses on how the concept of enlightenment can be applied to the Kantian psychology, which marks an important change of theory of the soul within modern western metaphysics. Kant's idea of enlightenment and 'critique' will be illustrated with reference to the "Paralogisms" of the Critique of Pure Reason. Finally, an analysis of some passages of the "Paralogisms" shall demonstrate that Kant's critique of the previous metaphysical doctrine of the human soul should not be understood as a complete rejection of this doctrine; rather, Kant's critique of what is called rational psychology should be understood as a critical transformation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document