Diocesanism versus Australia’s Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Alison M. Taylor

Abstract This article examines the contribution of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse to the ecclesiology of the Anglican Church of Australia (ACA). The focus is on diocesanism – the strong form of diocesan autonomy that exists in the ACA. The article concludes that the Royal Commission identified diocesanism and the associated dispersion of ecclesial authority as key factors constraining the ACA’s responses to child sexual abuse, and actively sought to modify its impact. The article also points to the significance of the Royal Commission’s findings to ACA ecclesiological understandings and change.

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-101
Author(s):  
Garth Blake

The 16th General Synod of the Anglican Church of Australia was held in Adelaide from 29 June to 3 July 2014. This report covers the major pieces of legislation dealt with at this session, as well as resolutions relating to the Anglican Communion, Church discipline and the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Waller ◽  
Tanja Dreher ◽  
Kristy Hess ◽  
Kerry McCallum ◽  
Eli Skogerbø

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny Crofts

The current Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has demonstrated serious long-term failures to prevent and adequately respond to child sexual abuse by institutions. Rather than regarding the law as a system of responsibility, this article argues that it can be read instead as organising irresponsibility, drawing upon Scott Veitch’s ideas in Law and Irresponsibility. His key argument is that legal institutions operate as much to deflect responsibility for harms suffered as to acknowledge them. This article focuses on the ways in which the criminal justice system is complicit in organising irresponsibility for systemic failures through an analysis of the Royal Commission Case Study No 6: The responses of a primary school and the Toowoomba Catholic Education Office to the Conduct of Gerald Byrnes. Through concrete examples, this article analyses the ways in which criminal law organises irresponsibility through the individuation of responsibility and the emphasis upon subjective culpability. These practices ensure irresponsibility for actors for systemic failures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document