Supernovæ

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (S339) ◽  
pp. 245-250
Author(s):  
M. Stritzinger ◽  
T. J. Moriya
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Table Discussion ◽  
The Future ◽  
Current Criterion ◽  
To Receive

AbstractThis Workshop covered a cornucopia of topics that were featured in short formal presentations, followed by a round-table discussion. G. Hosseinzadeh and H. Kuncarayakti presented the results of their recent researches into interacting supernovæ. They included both the intriguing Type Ibn supernova subclass, and SN 2017dio, which appears to be the first Type Ic supernova to be seen to exhibit signatures of hydrogen-rich circumstellar interaction at all phases. M. Sullivan provided a summary relating to the future of transient science in the era of Big Data, and participants discussed strategies to determine which targets and fields should be selected for spectroscopic follow-up. The Workshop concluded with a rather heated discussion regarding the need for the IAU Supernovæ Working Group to consider modifying the current criterion for a confirmed supernova in order for it to receive an official IAU designation.

scholarly journals Marking the 400th Anniversary of Kepler's Astronomia nova

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (H15) ◽  
pp. 821-827
Author(s):  
T. J. Mahoney
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Rio De Janeiro ◽  
Round Table ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Special Session ◽  
Johannes Kepler ◽  
Table Discussion ◽  
The Future ◽  
Open Session

AbstractSpecial Session 9 of the XXVII General Assembly (11–14 August 2009, Rio de Janeiro) was devoted to the topic “Marking the 400th Anniversary of Kepler's Astronomia nova”. During the two-and-a-half day meeting (spread over four days), there were nine invited and three contributed talks, a round-table discussion on the future of Kepler studies and an open session to propose the setting up of a Johannes Kepler Working Group under the aegis of the IAU.

Introduction

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Thomas Baldwin
Keyword(s):  
Round Table ◽  
Literary Work ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Table Discussion ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Future ◽  
Diabelli Variations

The starting point for the book is a series of metaphors used by Barthes at a round table discussion on Proust in 1972. He suggests, for example, that À la recherche is comparable to Beethoven’s Diabelli Variations insofar as it is made of ‘variations without a theme’, and he observes that a novel constructed in this way requires readers and critics to ‘rewrite’ and to ‘operate variations’ on the literary work rather than to interpret it. By unpacking these (and other) figures and connecting them to others that appear in Barthes’s (and Proust’s) writing, the remaining chapters of the book provide answers to the following questions: Are the variations in Proust’s novel indeed themeless? What is it that makes Proust’s writing, for Barthes or generally, both endlessly seductive, productive and unamenable to more conventional, hermeneutical forms of criticism? What does Barthes do with À la recherche, and how, in his approach, is Barthes different from other critics who have written about Proust? What possibilities do Barthes’s Proust variations open up for the future of criticism more generally?

A Round-Table Discussion of “Big” Data in Qualitative Organizational Communication Research

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan S. Bisel ◽  
J. Kevin Barge ◽  
Debbie S. Dougherty ◽  
Kristen Lucas ◽  
Sarah J. Tracy
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Organizational Communication ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Communication Research ◽  
Table Discussion
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document