scholarly journals Solar Rotational Oscillation and Its Subharmonics in Solar Wind Plasma Field, Geomagnetic, and Cosmic Ray Intensity Indicator in the Solar Cycle 24/25 Minimum

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. P. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Cosmic Ray Intensity ◽  
Rotational Oscillation ◽  
Solar Cycle 24 ◽  
Cycle 24

scholarly journals Study of the Very Slow Speed Solar Wind Streams with Cosmic Ray Intensity and Ae Index for Solar Cycle 24 (2008-2013)

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Pokharia ◽  
Lalan Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Magnetic Activity ◽  
Slow Speed ◽  
Cosmic Ray Intensity ◽  
Ae Index ◽  
Solar Cycle 24 ◽  
Speed Solar Wind ◽  
Cycle 24

The aim of this paper is to investigate the association of the variation of very slow speed solar wind streams (VSSSWS) with the cosmic ray intensity (CRI) and Ae index for solar cycle 24 (2008-2013). A Chree analysis by the superposed epoch method has been done in the study. The results of the present analysis showed that VSSSWS are not able to produce decreases in CRI. The prime source of the variation in magnetic activity near aurora zone is the wind interaction with the magnetosphere, but the speed of VSSSWS is low enough to produce any significant impact on aurora zone magnetic activity.

scholarly journals Study of the Very Slow Speed Solar Wind Streams with Cosmic Ray Intensity and Ae Index for Solar Cycle 24 (2008-2013)

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Pokharia ◽  
Lalan Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Magnetic Activity ◽  
Slow Speed ◽  
Cosmic Ray Intensity ◽  
Ae Index ◽  
Solar Cycle 24 ◽  
Speed Solar Wind ◽  
Cycle 24

The aim of this paper is to investigate the association of the variation of very slow speed solar wind streams (VSSSWS) with the cosmic ray intensity (CRI) and Ae index for solar cycle 24 (2008-2013). A Chree analysis by the superposed epoch method has been done in the study. The results of the present analysis showed that VSSSWS are not able to produce decreases in CRI. The prime source of the variation in magnetic activity near aurora zone is the wind interaction with the magnetosphere, but the speed of VSSSWS is low enough to produce any significant impact on aurora zone magnetic activity

Solar wind plasma associated with Dst -50 nT during solar cycle 24

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 280-285
Author(s):  
R.Singh P. ◽  
Ahmad S. ◽  
Nigam B. ◽  
K. Chamadia P. ◽  
K. Saxena A. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Solar Cycle 24 ◽  
Cycle 24

scholarly journals Solar Cycle Variation of Cosmic ray Intensity along with Interplanetary and Solar Wind Plasma Parameters

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 63-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Mishra ◽  
Rekha Agarwal ◽  
Sharad Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Solar Cycles ◽  
Plasma Parameters ◽  
Solar Cycle Variation ◽  
Cosmic Ray Intensity

Solar Cycle Variation of Cosmic ray Intensity along with Interplanetary and Solar Wind Plasma ParametersGalactic cosmic rays are modulated at their propagation in the heliosphere by the effect of the large-scale structure of the interplanetary medium. A comparison of the variations in the cosmic ray intensity data obtained by neutron monitoring stations with those in geomagnetic disturbance, solar wind velocity (V), interplanetary magnetic field (B), and their product (V' B) near the Earth for the period 1964-2004 has been presented so as to establish a possible correlation between them. We used the hourly averaged cosmic ray counts observed with the neutron monitor in Moscow. It is noteworthy that a significant negative correlation has been observed between the interplanetary magnetic field, product (V' B) and cosmic ray intensity during the solar cycles 21 and 22. The solar wind velocity has a good positive correlation with cosmic ray intensity during solar cycle 21, whereas it shows a weak correlation during cycles 20, 22 and 23. The interplanetary magnetic field shows a weak negative correlation with cosmic rays for solar cycle 20, and a good anti-correlation for solar cycles 21-23 with the cosmic ray intensity, which, in turn, shows a good positive correlation with disturbance time index (Dst) during solar cycles 21 and 22, and a weak correlation for cycles 20 and 23.

Solar rotational period of cosmic rays and solar activity during the maximum phase of solar cycle 24

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prithvi Raj Singh ◽  
A. I. Saad Farid ◽  
Y. P. Singh ◽  
A. K. Singh ◽  
Ayman A. Aly
Keyword(s):  
Solar Activity ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Cosmic Rays ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
R Package ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Maximum Phase ◽  
Cosmic Ray Intensity ◽  
Solar Cycle 24 ◽  
Cycle 24

Abstract To study the solar rotational oscillation on daily averaged time series of solar activity proxies: sunspot number (SSN), modified coronal index (MCI), solar flare index (FI), and cosmic ray intensity (CRI) are subjected to Lomb/Scargle periodogram, and continuous wavelet transform. For this purpose, we have used data of all the considered parameters from 2012 to 2015, which covers the maximum phase including the polarity reversal period of the solar cycle 24. Both spectral analysis techniques are carried out to study the behavior of 27-days on the time scale of the synodic period and to follow their evolution throughout the epoch. Further, we have used R package RobPer (least square regression) techniques and obtained a significant true period ~27 days is present in this study. It is noted that the ~27-day period of solar activity parameters and cosmic rays is much prominent during the examined period.

On the possible mechanism of the first ground level enhancement in cosmic ray intensity of solar cycle 24

2013 ◽  
Vol 350 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazi A. Firoz ◽  
W. Q. Gan ◽  
Y. P. Li ◽  
J. Rodriguez-Pacheco
Keyword(s):  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Ground Level Enhancement ◽  
Cosmic Ray Intensity ◽  
Solar Cycle 24 ◽  
Cycle 24

Geomagnetic Consequences of Interacting CMEs of June 13-14, 2012

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (S335) ◽  
pp. 65-68
Author(s):  
Nandita Srivastava ◽  
Zavkiddin Mirtoshev ◽  
Wageesh Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Solar Cycle 24 ◽  
In Situ Observations ◽  
Cycle 24

AbstractWe have studied the consequences of interacting coronal mass ejections (CMEs) of June 13-14, 2012 which were directed towards Earth and caused a moderate geomagnetic storm with Dst index ~ −86 nT. We analysed the in-situ observations of the solar wind plasma and magnetic field parameters obtained from the OMNI database for these CMEs. The in-situ observations show that the interacting CMEs arrive at Earth with the strongest (~ 150 nT) Sudden Storm Commencement (SSC) of the solar cycle 24. We compared these interacting CMEs to a similar interaction event which occurred during November 9-10, 2012. This occurred in the same phase of the solar cycle 24 but resulted in an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst ~ −108 nT), as reported by Mishra et al. (2015). Our analysis shows that in the June event, the interaction led to a merged structure at 1 AU while in the case of November 2012 event, the interacted CMEs arrived as two distinct structures at 1 AU. The geomagnetic signatures of the two cases reveal that both resulted in a single step geomagnetic storm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document