Outcome assessment in family therapy.

2022 ◽  
pp. 269-282
Author(s):  
Charles Fishman ◽  
Angus Craig ◽  
Scott Browning ◽  
Rachel Hull ◽  
Allison Rozovsky
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-5

Abstract Different jurisdictions use the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) for different purposes, and this article reviews a specific jurisdictional definition in the Province of Ontario of catastrophic impairment that incorporates the AMA Guides. In Ontario, a whole person impairment (WPI) exceeding 54% or a mental or behavioral impairment of Class 4 or 5 qualifies the individual for catastrophic benefits, and individuals who do not meet the test receive a lesser benefit. By inference, this establishes a parity threshold among dissimilar injuries and dissimilar outcome assessment scales for benefits. In Ontario, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) identifies patients who have a high probability of death or of severely disabled survival. The GCS recognizes gradations of vegetative state and disability, but translating the gradations for rating individual impairment on ordinal scales into a method of assessing percentage impairments cannot be done reliably, as explained in the AMA Guides, Fifth Edition. The AMA Guides also notes that mental and behavioral impairment in Class 4 (marked impairment) or 5 (extreme impairment) indicates “catastrophic impairment” by significantly impeding useful functioning (Class 4) or significantly impeding useful functioning and implying complete dependency on another person for care (Class 5). Translating the AMA Guides guidelines into ordinal scales cannot be done reliably.


1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Storm King ◽  
Susan Engi ◽  
Stephan Poulos
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian J. Bachmann ◽  
Gerd Lehmkuhl ◽  
Franz Petermann ◽  
Stephen Scott

Bei der Behandlung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit aggressivem Verhalten ist in den vergangenen Jahren vor allem im englischsprachigen Ausland ein Trend zum Einsatz evidenzbasierter psychotherapeutischer Interventionen zu verzeichnen. In diesem Beitrag werden–getrennt für Kindes- und Jugendalter–die am besten evaluierten Therapieprogramme (u. a. Multisystemic Therapy, Functional Family Therapy, The Incredible Years) für diese Indikation dargestellt. Es werden aktuelle Fragen der Implementation und Disseminierung evidenzbasierter Interventionen für aggressive Kinder und Jugendliche diskutiert (z. B. Qualitätssicherung, Therapietreue). Abschließend werden Perspektiven für eine Implementation evidenzbasierter Interventionen in Deutschland aufgezeigt.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adele Lafrance ◽  
Katherine A. Henderson ◽  
Shari Mayman

2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Kameguchi ◽  
Stephen Murphy-Shigematsu

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele M. Patterson
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 733-733
Author(s):  
Daniel J Harkness ◽  
Jennifer L. Bernasek
Keyword(s):  

1975 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 814-815
Author(s):  
STEVEN J. GROSS
Keyword(s):  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar A. Barbarin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document