scholarly journals The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition.

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Brysbaert ◽  
Françoise Vitu ◽  
Walter Schroyens
Author(s):  
Ben A. Parris ◽  
Dinkar Sharma ◽  
Brendan Weekes

Abstract. Coloring only a single letter in the Stroop task can result in a reduction or elimination of Stroop interference. The present experiments were designed to test whether this modulation of Stroop interference occurs at all letter positions. Specifically, we investigated whether Stroop interference was reduced when the colored letter occupied the optimal viewing position (OVP). The experiments show that Stroop interference is not reduced at the OVP (Experiment 1) and that Stroop interference at the OVP is significantly greater than at other letter positions (Experiments 1 and 2). This finding has important theoretical and methodological consequences for studies of automatic processing in visual word recognition.


2013 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 114-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Yao-N’Dré ◽  
Eric Castet ◽  
Françoise Vitu

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E.R. Nicholls ◽  
Amanda G. Wood

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-376
Author(s):  
Lin Li ◽  
Sha Li ◽  
Jingxin Wang ◽  
Victoria A. McGowan ◽  
Pingping Liu ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 895-898
Author(s):  
Stephen Meredith Williams

The right visual-field advantage for bilateral presentation put forward by McKeever and Huling was investigated. The central-fixation task was varied so that in one condition this task was nonverbal. Results gave some support for scanning-type explanations in this paradigm but over-all favoured Kinsbourne's activation-and-priming account.


1976 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fudin

McKeever and Huling questioned procedures in experiments on lateral differences in the recognition of horizontally oriented multi-letter stimuli, tachistoscopically exposed bilaterally. They effected three major changes in this method and found superior scores for material in the right than left visual field, a result in the opposite direction of prior findings. Ideas from directional scanning and cerebral dominance accounts of lateral asymmetries suggest that McKeever and Huling's methodological innovations produced their result. Directional scanning notions indicate that horizontal targets impede measures of differences in processing skills of the cerebral hemispheres. These obstacles can be overcome by exposing vertically oriented targets.


1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 755-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Curcio ◽  
William Mackavey ◽  
Jeffrey Rosen

It has been suggested that a correlation between word recognition and visual acuity would constitute a confounding influence in word-recognition studies within a laterality paradigm. 20 Ss made binary judgments concerning the presence or absence of a spatial gap in a tachistoscopically presented line target positioned at .75°, 1.5°, 3.0°, and 6.0° in either visual field. Gap detection was superior in the right visual field ( p = .02) at the 6.0° position. Word recognition was determined for tachistoscopically presented three-letter words positioned along a 6.0° vertical meridian in either visual field. Visual acuity performance was not related to word recognition either for the group or for individual Ss. The data therefore do not encourage the view that normal variations in acuity significantly affect word recognition in laterality studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document