Minority stress, masculinity, and social norms predicting gay men's health risk behaviors.

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Hamilton ◽  
James R. Mahalik
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (7) ◽  
pp. 1282-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christi L Nelson ◽  
Ross Andel

Abstract Background and Objectives Based on the Minority Stress Theory, this article examines the associations between sexual orientation and self-reported measures of physical, mental, and cognitive health, as well as health risk behaviors. Research Design and Methods The analytical sample included members of the 2016 wave of the Health and Retirement Study aged 50+ years. Binary and ordered logistic regressions were conducted to assess whether being a sexual minority was associated with poorer self-rated physical, mental, and cognitive health, as well as being more likely to engage in health risk behaviors. Results In analyses using overall and propensity-matched samples, lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) participants were about twice as likely to report ever having depression as their heterosexual counterparts but were also more likely to report better self-rated health. The LGB group was more likely to report ever having smoked but were not significantly different in any of the other health risk behaviors. Discussion and Implications LGB individuals appear to be at greater risk of ever experiencing depression than heterosexual individuals but, at the same time, report better physical health. This may suggest a tendency for resilience. Differences in health risk behavior may also exist. Mental health and other medical professionals should receive special training to better understand the unique problems of LGB individuals.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Isacco ◽  
Nicole K. Yallum ◽  
Lindsay C. Chromik

This article focuses on how health practitioners can better understand and intervene with gay men. Gay men’s health is situated within 3 prominent theoretical models (ie, minority stress, gender socialization, and identity development) and associated with 3 constructs (ie, internalized homonegativity, internalized homophobia, and internalized heterosexism) to contextualize gay men’s health concerns. Throughout the article, the authors draw particular attention to research that emphasizes the strengths of gay men, as this is a notable gap in the extant literature. Furthermore, HIV/AIDS is a central concern of gay men, and this article focuses on how cultural identities and factors may intersect with HIV/AIDS status among gay men and have implications for health decision making. Affirmative clinical interventions based on theory and research are presented throughout the article, which can be applied by health professionals in various settings. Given the confusion around terminology, lack of knowledge of available resources, and prevailing negative societal myths about gay men, the article provides a glossary of definitions for unclear terms, actively disputes myths that are not empirically supported, and provides a list of available resources.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. H. Shilubane ◽  
Rob Ruiter ◽  
B. H. W. van den Borne ◽  
P. S. Reddy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document