Treatment of Department of Veterans Affairs primary care patients with posttraumatic stress disorder.

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Possemato ◽  
Paige Ouimette ◽  
Larry J. Lantinga ◽  
Michael Wade ◽  
Deb Coolhart ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Ramaswamy ◽  
Vishal Madaan ◽  
Faiz Qadri ◽  
Christoper J. Heaney ◽  
Terry C. North ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 192 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caron Zlotnick ◽  
Benjamin F. Rodriguez ◽  
Risa B. Weisberg ◽  
Steven E. Bruce ◽  
Michael A. Spencer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-211
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Chen ◽  
Matthew Jakupcak ◽  
Russell McCann ◽  
Jacqueline J. Fickel ◽  
Carol E. Simons ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Lee ◽  
Sarah Schubert

A recently released report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2008) commissioned by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs examined the evidence for psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It concluded that the evidence was inadequate to determine the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in the treatment of PTSD. However, a critical examination of the basis for this conclusion reveals errors in three areas. First, the findings of key studies that reported positive outcomes for EMDR were misrepresented; second, a number of positive studies were excluded without apparent justification; and, finally, the IOM report failed to consider additional readily available studies that also reported benefits for EMDR. These factors appear to explain why the conclusions of the IOM report are at odds with the numerous meta-analyses and practice guidelines of PTSD treatments issued by other scientific committees worldwide.


2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 286-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos I. Pérez Benítez ◽  
Caron Zlotnick ◽  
Robert I. Stout ◽  
Fengjuan Lou ◽  
Ingrid Dyck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document