scholarly journals Does comorbid chronic pain affect posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis and treatment? Outcomes of posttraumatic stress disorder screening in Department of Veterans Affairs primary care

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha D. Outcalt ◽  
Helena Maria Hoen ◽  
Zhangsheng Yu ◽  
Tenesha Marie Franks ◽  
Erin E. Krebs
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Department Of Veterans Affairs ◽  
Pain Affect

Treatment of Department of Veterans Affairs primary care patients with posttraumatic stress disorder.

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Possemato ◽  
Paige Ouimette ◽  
Larry J. Lantinga ◽  
Michael Wade ◽  
Deb Coolhart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Department Of Veterans Affairs ◽  
Primary Care Patients

scholarly journals Primary Care Perspective of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder for the Department of Veterans Affairs

2005 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Ramaswamy ◽  
Vishal Madaan ◽  
Faiz Qadri ◽  
Christoper J. Heaney ◽  
Terry C. North ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Department Of Veterans Affairs

Posttraumatic stress disorder collaborative care: A quality improvement study in veterans affairs primary care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-211
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Chen ◽  
Matthew Jakupcak ◽  
Russell McCann ◽  
Jacqueline J. Fickel ◽  
Carol E. Simons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Veterans Affairs

Omissions and Errors in the Institute of Medicine’s Report on Scientific Evidence of Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Lee ◽  
Sarah Schubert
Keyword(s):  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Critical Examination ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Department Of Veterans Affairs ◽  
Pharmacological Treatments ◽  
Meta Analyses

A recently released report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2008) commissioned by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs examined the evidence for psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It concluded that the evidence was inadequate to determine the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in the treatment of PTSD. However, a critical examination of the basis for this conclusion reveals errors in three areas. First, the findings of key studies that reported positive outcomes for EMDR were misrepresented; second, a number of positive studies were excluded without apparent justification; and, finally, the IOM report failed to consider additional readily available studies that also reported benefits for EMDR. These factors appear to explain why the conclusions of the IOM report are at odds with the numerous meta-analyses and practice guidelines of PTSD treatments issued by other scientific committees worldwide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document