Supplemental Material for Embracing in a Female-Bonded Monkey Species (Theropithecus gelada)

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Theropithecus Gelada ◽  
Monkey Species

Playing with the face: Playful facial “chattering” and signal modulation in a monkey species (Theropithecus gelada).

2011 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Palagi ◽  
Giada Mancini
Keyword(s):  
Signal Modulation ◽  
Theropithecus Gelada ◽  
Monkey Species ◽  
The Face

scholarly journals Embracing in a female-bonded monkey species (Theropithecus gelada).

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Pallante ◽  
Pier Francesco Ferrari ◽  
Marco Gamba ◽  
Elisabetta Palagi
Keyword(s):  
Theropithecus Gelada ◽  
Monkey Species

scholarly journals Body Site and Body Orientation Preferences during Social Grooming: A Comparison between Wild and Captive Chimpanzees and Bonobos

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Morgane Allanic ◽  
Misato Hayashi ◽  
Takeshi Furuichi ◽  
Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Keyword(s):  
Dominance Rank ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Body Site ◽  
Social Variables ◽  
Social Grooming ◽  
Social Differences ◽  
Monkey Species ◽  
Site Preferences ◽  
Risk Of Predation ◽  
Species Specific

Grooming site preferences have been relatively well studied in monkey species in order to investigate the function of social grooming. They are not only influenced by the amount of ectoparasites, but also by different social variables such as the dominance rank between individuals or their levels of affiliation. However, studies on this topic mainly come from monkey species, with almost no report on great apes. This study aimed to explore whether body site and body orientation preferences during social grooming show species-specific differences (bonobos vs. chimpanzees) and environment-specific differences (captivity vs. wild). Results showed that bonobos groomed the head, the front and faced each other more often than chimpanzees, while chimpanzees groomed the back, anogenitals and more frequently in face-to-back positions. Moreover, captive individuals were found to groom facing one another more often than wild ones, whereas wild individuals groomed the back and in face-to-back positions more. While future studies should expand their scope to include more populations per condition, our preliminary 2 by 2 comparison study highlights the influence of (i) species-specific social differences such as social tolerance, social attention and facial communication, and (ii) socioenvironmental constraints such as risk of predation, spatial crowding and levels of hygiene, that might be the two important factors determining the grooming patterns in two <i>Pan</i>species.

Morphology and mitochondrial phylogenetics reveal that the Amazon River separates two eastern squirrel monkey species: Saimiri sciureus and S. collinsi

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 426-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle P. Mercês ◽  
Jessica W. Lynch Alfaro ◽  
Wallax A.S. Ferreira ◽  
Maria L. Harada ◽  
José S. Silva Júnior
Keyword(s):  
Squirrel Monkey ◽  
Saimiri Sciureus ◽  
Amazon River ◽  
Monkey Species

Female Reproductive Parameters in Wild Geladas (Theropithecus gelada)

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eila K. Roberts ◽  
Amy Lu ◽  
Thore J. Bergman ◽  
Jacinta C. Beehner
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Parameters ◽  
Theropithecus Gelada

scholarly journals Different neural strategies for multimodal integration: comparison of two macaque monkey species

2009 ◽  
Vol 195 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soroush G. Sadeghi ◽  
Diana E. Mitchell ◽  
Kathleen E. Cullen
Keyword(s):  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Multimodal Integration ◽  
Monkey Species
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document