The intersectionality framework and identity intersections in the Journal of Counseling Psychology and The Counseling Psychologist: A content analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Q. Shin ◽  
Jamie C. Welch ◽  
Aylin E. Kaya ◽  
Jeffrey G. Yeung ◽  
Chynna Obana ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddie S.K. Chong ◽  
Yun Lu ◽  
Brian Taehyuk Keum ◽  
Xu Li ◽  
Michal Y. Boyars ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candice Hargons ◽  
Della V. Mosley ◽  
Danelle Stevens-Watkins

Using a sex-positive framework, we conducted a 61-year (1954–2015) content analysis of sexuality research featured in The Counseling Psychologist and the Journal of Counseling Psychology. We aimed to uncover (a) which human sexuality topics were published most, (b) whether the publications aligned with sex-positive, neutral, or negative discourse, (c) what methodologies were used, and (d) differences in how populations were investigated across racial groups. We used an integrative approach to the content analysis and human coding. Results highlighted in 188 articles meeting criteria, the largest focus (38%) was on sexual orientation, sexual identity, and sexual minorities; only 5% utilized a sex-positive perspective. Quantitative and conceptual articles were the most published methods, and publications disproportionately focused on non-Latino White populations. When people of color were included, the discourse was sex negative. Implications for research and practice are discussed.


1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter C., Jr. Buboltz ◽  
Matthew Miller ◽  
David J. Williams

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane J. Lopez ◽  
Jeana L. Magyar-Moe ◽  
Stephanie E. Petersen ◽  
Jamie A. Ryder ◽  
Thomas S. Krieshok ◽  
...  

The Major Contribution aims to provide interrelated articles that examine how counseling psychology's past and the complex world we live and work in bear on our professional understanding of human strengths and positive life outcomes. In this article, the authors examine the historical underpinnings of the positive in psychology, analyze the focus on the positive in counseling psychology scholarship through the decades (via a content analysis), and review scholarship that has shaped the strength-based work of professionals throughout applied psychology. The content analysis of a random selection of 20% (N = 1,135) of the articles published in the Journal of Counseling Psychology (JCP), The Counseling Psychologist (TCP ), theJournal of Career Assessment (JCA ), and theJournal of Multicultural Counseling and Development (JMCD) revealed that about 29% have a positive focus. This article calls attention to the positive in counseling psychology, and the authors encourage its members to reaffirm its unique positive focus by focusing more on strength in practice and research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document