Serial-Position Curves for Lures in Recognition Memory

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. K. Mewhort ◽  
Elizabeth E. Johns
2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 2832-2843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yigal Agam ◽  
Daniel Bullock ◽  
Robert Sekuler

A fundamental challenge in neuroscience is to understand the mechanisms by which multicomponent actions are represented and sequenced for production. We addressed this challenge with a movement-imitation task in which subjects viewed the quasi-random, two-dimensional movements of a disc and then used a stylus to reproduce the remembered trajectory. The stimulus disc moved along straight segments, which differed sufficiently from one another that it was possible to trace individual segments' fate in the resulting movement imitation. A biologically based segmentation algorithm decomposed each imitation into segments whose directions could be compared with those of homologous segments in the model. As the number of linked segments in a stimulus model grew from three to seven, imitation became less accurate, with segments more likely to be deleted, particularly from a model's final stages. When fidelity of imitation was assessed segment by segment, the resulting serial position curves showed a strong primacy effect and a moderate recency effect. Analysis of pairwise transposition errors revealed a striking preponderance of exchanges between adjacent segments that, along with the serial position effects, supports a competitive queuing model of sequencing. In analogy to results with verbal serial recall, repetition of one directed segment in the model reduced imitation quality. Results with longer stimulus models suggest that the segment-by-segment imitation generator may be supplemented in the final stages of imitation by an error-signal driven overlay that produces a late-course, real-time correction. Results are related to neural mechanisms that are known to support sequential motor behavior and working memory.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Osth ◽  
Simon Farrell

Memory models have typically characterized retrieval in free recall as multi-alternative decision making. However, the majority of these models have only been applied to mean response times (RTs), and have not accounted for the complete RT distributions. We show that RT distributions carry diagnostic information about how items enter into competition for recall, and how that competition impacts on the dynamics of recall. We jointly fit RT distributions and serial position functions of free recall initiation with both a racing diffusion model and the linear ballistic accumulator (LBA: Brown & Heathcote, 2008) model in a hierarchical Bayesian framework while factorially varying different assumptions of how primacy and recency are generated. Recency was either a power law or an exponential function. Primacy was treated either as a strength boost to the early list items so that both primacy and recency items jointly compete to be retrieved, a rehearsal process whereby the first item is sometimes rehearsed to the end of the list to make it functionally recent, or due to reinstatement of the start of the list. While serial position curves do not distinguish between these accounts, they make distinct predictions about how RT distributions vary across serial positions. Results from a number of datasets strongly favor the reinstatement account of primacy with an exponential recency function. These results suggest that models of free recall can be more constrained by considering complete RT distributions.


2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Palladino ◽  
Christopher Jarrold

Updating tasks require participants to process a sequence of items, varying in length, and afterwards to remember only a fixed number of the elements of the sequence; the assumption being that participants actively update the to-be-recalled list as presentation progresses. However recent evidence has cast doubt on this assumption, and the present study examined the strategies that participants employ in such tasks by comparing the serial position curves found in verbal and visuo-spatial updating tasks with those seen in standard serial recall tasks. These comparisons showed that even when the same number of items are presented or recalled, participants perform less well in an updating than a serial recall context. In addition, while standard serial position effects were observed for serial recall, marked recency and reduced or absent primacy effects were seen in updating conditions. These findings suggest that participants do not typically adopt a strategy of actively updating the memory list in updating tasks, but instead tend to wait passively until the list ends before trying to recall the most recently presented items.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document