Human latent inhibition and learned irrelevance: Addressing existing limitations

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Schmidt-Hansen ◽  
Nicola S. Gray ◽  
Lisa H. Evans ◽  
Robert J. Snowden
1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Oberling ◽  
Lisa M. Gunther ◽  
Ralph R. Miller

2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Todd Allen ◽  
Lori Chelius ◽  
Vivek Masand ◽  
Mark A. Gluck ◽  
Catherine E. Myers ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (1b) ◽  
pp. 80-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Bonardi ◽  
Siaw Yann Ong

This article reviews the recent literature on the topic of learned irrelevance. It asks whether the retardation of subsequent conditioning produced by uncorrelated preexposure is indeed the result of the animal learning that a conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) are unrelated, or whether it is better explained either as a result of the context specificity of latent inhibition, or as some other artefact of the uncorrelated schedule employed. The conclusion is that there is as yet no good evidence to support the existence of a “genuine” learned irrelevance effect.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Schmidt-Hansen ◽  
A. S. Killcross ◽  
R. C. Honey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document