How Much Is Too Much? Evaluating the Effects of Additional Comorbidity on PTSD and Alcohol Treatment

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Lopez-Castro ◽  
Santiago Papini
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. C. Blow ◽  
M. A. Walton ◽  
S. T. Chermack ◽  
S. A. Mudd ◽  
K. J. Brower

1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Crosswhite ◽  
William Nardini

1994 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 867-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Itamura ◽  
Tadaaki Fukushima ◽  
Toshio Kitamura ◽  
Hisashi Harada ◽  
Satoshi Taira ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 154120402110276
Author(s):  
Caitlin M. Brady ◽  
Jennifer H. Peck

While prior studies of juvenile court outcomes have examined the impact of legal representation on out-of-home placement versus community sanctions, previous research has not fully explored the variation within sanctions that youth receive. The current study examines the influence of type of legal representation (public defender or private attorney) when predicting juvenile adjudications and dispositions. Using a sample of delinquent referrals from a Northeast state between 2009 and 2014, results showed that youth do receive different outcomes (e.g., probation, drug and alcohol treatment, accountability-oriented dispositions, etc.) based on the type of legal representation. The findings have important implications for juvenile court processing related to how courtroom actors impact case outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document