New Federal Regulations Issued to Improve Methadone Treatment

2001 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Methadone Treatment ◽  
Federal Regulations

Response to Intervention and Current Implementation

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
Janet L. Proly
Keyword(s):  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Federal Regulations ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Current Implementation ◽  
Rti Implementation ◽  
Level Of Understanding

Abstract Response to Intervention (RTI) implementation is becoming more widespread due to the references of RTI components in the Federal Regulations. But everyone is not at the same level of understanding about RTI and its implementation. This article will answer several questions. What is RTI? Why are we hearing more and more about RTI? How are states implementing RTI components? How can the speech-language pathologist help in RTI implementation in the presence or absence of a specific RTI infrastructure? How is Florida Proceeding with RTI implementation? Are there any new resources available for principals and other educators who might want to learn more about RTI?

Problems in methadone treatment: The influence of reference groups.

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana E. Hunt ◽  
Douglas S. Lipton ◽  
Douglas S. Goldsmith ◽  
David L. Strug
Keyword(s):  
Methadone Treatment ◽  
Reference Groups

Contingency Management in Methadone Treatment: The Case for Positive Incentives

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxine L. Stitzer ◽  
Martin Y. Iguchi ◽  
Michael Kidorf ◽  
George E. Bigelow
Keyword(s):  
Contingency Management ◽  
Methadone Treatment

Impact of regulatory framework rigidity on poverty in the regions of Russia

2020 ◽  
pp. 62-79
Author(s):  
P. N. Pavlov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Activity ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Institutional Factors ◽  
Federal Regulations ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
Poverty Dynamics ◽  
Regulatory Burden ◽  
Sectoral Structure ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Regions Of Russia

The paper analyzes the impact of the federal regulatory burden on poverty dynamics in Russia. The paper provides regional level indices of the federal regulatory burden on the economy in 2008—2018 which take into account sectoral structure of regions’ output and the level of regulatory rigidity of federal regulations governing certain types of economic activity. Estimates of empirical specifications of poverty theoretical model with the inclusion of macroeconomic and institutional factors shows that limiting the scope of the rulemaking activity of government bodies and weakening of new regulations rigidity contributes to a statistically significant reduction in the level of poverty in Russian regions. Cancellation of 10% of accumulated federal level requirements through the “regulatory guillotine” administrative reform may take out of poverty about 1.1—1.4 million people.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document