Community Interventions Should Make Economists Rethink Economics

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shiell ◽  
P. Hawe
2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne S. Fenton

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Tara Boelsen-Robinson ◽  
Anna Peeters ◽  
Alison Beauchamp ◽  
Alexandra Chung ◽  
Emma Gearon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Bandopadhay ◽  
◽  
G. B. Woelk ◽  
M. P. Kieffer ◽  
D. Mpofu

AbstractThe ACCLAIM Study aimed to assess the effect of a package of community interventions on the demand for, uptake of, and retention of HIV-positive pregnant/postpartum women in maternal and child health (MCH) and prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) services. The study occurred from 2013 to 2015 in Eswatini, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. The three interventions were: (1) a social learning and action component for community leaders, (2) community days, and (3) peer discussion groups. Household cross-sectional surveys on community members’ MCH and PMTCT knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs were analyzed pre- and post-intervention, using MCH, HIV stigma, and gender-equitable men (GEM) indicators. We used t-tests to measure the significance of mean pre- vs. post-intervention score changes stratified by gender within each intervention arm and generalized linear models to compare mean score changes of the cumulative intervention arms with the community leaders-only intervention. Response rates were over 85% for both surveys for men and women, with a total of 3337 pre-intervention and 3162 post-intervention responses. The combined package of three interventions demonstrated a significantly greater increase in MCH scores for both women (diff = 1.34, p ≤ 0.001) and men (diff = 2.03, p < 0.001). The arms that included interventions for both community leader engagement and community days (arms 2 and 3)led to a greater increase in mean GEM scores compared to the community leader engagement intervention alone (arm 1), for both women (diff = 1.32, p = 0.002) and men (diff = 1.37, p = 0.004). Our findings suggest that a package of community interventions may be most effective in increasing community MCH/HIV knowledge and improving gender-equitable norms.


The Lancet ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 382 (9899) ◽  
pp. 1183-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Ayles ◽  
Monde Muyoyeta ◽  
Elizabeth Du Toit ◽  
Ab Schaap ◽  
Sian Floyd ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubi Arellano ◽  
Fabricio Balcazar ◽  
Sergio Suarez ◽  
Francisco Alvarado

For several decades, community interventions have promoted community development with strategies involving capacity building, advocacy, social change, and empowerment. Although community interventions intend to ameliorate social and economic inequalities, there is still a need to evaluate the outcomes of Participatory Action Research (PAR). PAR approaches have demonstrated to be a helpful tool for addressing and identifying community issues and strengths, while leading community members into action. The PAR approach described in this case study of “Ciudad Renace” (Town Reborn)—the Concerns Report Method (CRM)—provided a process for the community to come together and identify main issues, organize, and take actions. The findings suggest multiple activities and outcomes in areas like environmental contamination, social services, and education. Participatory methodologies like the Concerns report Method provided opportunities for community members to become engaged in pursing issues and addressing their own needs. The implications for community psychology research and practice are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document