Effects of Individuating Information on Racial Stereotypes About Intelligence

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel S. Rubinstein ◽  
Lee Jussim ◽  
Thomas R. Cain ◽  
Karin E. Kopitskie
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Rubinstein ◽  
Lee Jussim ◽  
Sean T. Stevens

This research investigated whether stereotypes or individuating information take primacy in implicit and explicit person perception. Study 1 investigated whether variation in the diagnosticity of individuating information moderated stereotype bias in implicit and explicit person perception. Increases in diagnosticity produced a linear reduction in explicit and implicit stereotype bias; with more diagnostic individuating information, there was less bias. Studies 2 and 3 examined the effects on person perception of racial stereotypes and of diagnostic individuating information that varied in valence. Study 2 found no substantial implicit or explicit anti-Black stereotype bias in the presence of diagnostic individuating information and large individuating information effects on explicit person perception. Study 3 found no explicit anti-Black stereotype bias in the presence of diagnostic individuating information and that individuating information influenced both implicit and explicit person perception. Together, these studies showed that individuating information can reduce or eliminate stereotype bias in implicit and explicit person perception and that its effect depends on the diagnosticity of the information. In addition, patterns of reliance on stereotypes and individuating information in implicit and explicit person perception generally converged. Results are discussed in the context of current controversies about the processes underlying implicit and explicit social cognition.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Koch ◽  
Susan D'Mello ◽  
Paul R. Sackett

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Tafalla ◽  
Sarah Wood ◽  
Sarah Albers ◽  
Stephanie Irwin ◽  
Eric Mann

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Markey ◽  
James D. Ivory ◽  
Erica B. Slotter ◽  
Mary Beth Oliver ◽  
Omar Maglalang

Author(s):  
Philipp Zehmisch

Chapter 6 explores how the contracting of Ranchi labourers from Chotanagpur as successors to colonial convicts in the task of forest clearance and infrastructure development has conditioned their marginalized position in the Andaman society. Since the advent of their migration in 1918, racial stereotypes attached to their ‘aboriginality’ accompanied the Ranchis to the islands. Having been continuously exploited and discriminated against as ‘tribals’ by decision-makers and members of the Andaman society, the Ranchis remained, as a result, alienated from the lines of social mobility. A historical analysis of the Ranchis’ disenfranchisement in the first section of the chapter is followed by the presentation of three exemplary life histories of subaltern migrants in the second section. Here, the author underlines the argument that migration cannot be understood as a one-dimensional process of exploitation, but that the voices and perspectives of subalterns as silenced agents of history must be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document