The Early Receptor Potential (ERP) in Hereditary Retinal Disease

1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bruce Goldstein ◽  
Eliot L. Berson
1977 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 621-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
J E Lisman ◽  
H Bering

Two partly independent electrophysiological methods are described for measuring the number of rhodopsin molecules (R) in single ventral photoreceptors. Method 1 is based on measurements of the relative intensity required to elicit a quantal response and the relative intensity required to half-saturate the early receptor potential (ERP). Method 2 is based on measurements of the absolute intensity required to elicit a quantal response. Both methods give values of R approximately equal to 10(9). From these and other measurements, estimates are derived for the surface density of rhodopsin (8,000/micrometer2), the charge movement during the ERP per isomerized rhodopsin (20 X 10(-21) C), and the half-time for thermal isomerization of rhodopsin (36yr).


Hereditary retinal disease (HRD) is a group of pathologies characterized by histologically abnormally developing vitreous gel associated with peripheral retinal degenerative or proliferative changes. In HRD alterations in the structure of the vitreous with abnormal vitreoretinal adhesions can predispose to developing Retinal Detachment (RD). Many HRD is seen with a part of syndromes most of which have systemic abnormalities affecting the joints, skeletal system, and cardiovascular system.  Due to delayed diagnosis in younger age patients,  without prominent symptoms, most patients with HR presented with proliferative vitreoretinopathy PVR and macula-involving RD.


1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1663-1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Gagné ◽  
J.G.H Roebroek ◽  
D.G. Stavenga

1987 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winfried M�ller ◽  
Helmut T�pke

1973 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fein ◽  
R. D. DeVoe

The early receptor potential (ERP), membrane potential, membrane resistance, and sensitivity were measured during light and/or dark adaptation in the ventral eye of Limulus. After a bright flash, the ERP amplitude recovered with a time constant of 100 ms, whereas the sensitivity recovered with an initial time constant of 20 s. When a strong adapting light was turned off, the recovery of membrane potential and of membrane resistance had time-courses similar to each other, and both recovered more rapidly than the sensitivity. The receptor depolarization was compared during dark adaptation after strong illumination and during light adaptation with weaker illumination; at equal sensitivities the cell was more depolarized during light adaptation than during dark adaptation. Finally, the waveforms of responses to flashes were compared during dark adaptation after strong illumination and during light adaptation with weaker illumination. At equal sensitivities (equal amplitude responses for identical flashes), the responses during light adaptation had faster time-courses than the responses during dark adaptation. Thus neither the photochemical cycle nor the membrane potential nor the membrane resistance is related to sensitivity changes during dark adaptation in the photoreceptors of the ventral eye. By elimination, these results imply that there are (unknown) intermediate process(es) responsible for adaptation interposed between the photochemical cycle and the electrical properties of the photoreceptor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document