Associative facilitation in the recall and recognition of nouns embedded in connected discourse.

1968 ◽  
Vol 78 (2, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 254-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Connected Discourse

Predicting the understanding of Cantonese connected discourse

1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Kei ◽  
Bruce Murdoch ◽  
Veronica Smyth ◽  
Bradley McPherson
Keyword(s):  
Connected Discourse

Imagery and theme in recall of connected discourse.

1974 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. de Villiers
Keyword(s):  
Connected Discourse

scholarly journals The Communicative Informativeness and Efficiency of Connected Discourse by Adults With Aphasia Under Structured and Conversational Sampling Conditions

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 130-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Doyle ◽  
Amy J. Goda ◽  
Kristie A. Spencer
Keyword(s):  
Verbal Communication ◽  
Conversational Discourse ◽  
Correct Information ◽  
Connected Discourse ◽  
Sampling Conditions ◽  
High Degree

Measuring communicative informativeness under conversational discourse conditions is perhaps the most valid means of determining the interpersonal verbal communication abilities of adults with aphasia. Nevertheless, the data derived from such analyses are expensive to collect and subject to unknown sources of variability. In this study, samples of connected discourse were obtained from 20 subjects with aphasia under structured and conversational sampling conditions to determine the extent to which they were related on measures of communicative informativeness. Results revealed that subjects produced significantly greater percentages of informative words [i.e., correct information units (Nicholas & Brookshire, 1993)] under conversational discourse conditions, but that the percentage of correct information units produced during structured discourse tasks could be used to predict performance under conversational conditions with a high degree of accuracy.

Investigating a tactile speechreading aid: Transmission of prosodic information in connected discourse and sentences

1980 ◽  
Vol 68 (S1) ◽  
pp. S58-S58
Author(s):  
Ken W. Grant ◽  
Patricia K. Kuhl ◽  
LeeAnn H. Ardell ◽  
David W. Sparks ◽  
Bryce Carey
Keyword(s):  
Connected Discourse

NOTE ON THE RETENTION OF CONNECTED DISCOURSE

1967 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Cohen ◽  
Bo S. Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Connected Discourse

Relationship between Rated Degree of Familiarity with Individual Sentences and the Extent of Recall of Connected Discourse

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1195-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Mills ◽  
Alan Nicolas-Fanourakis
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Interference Theory ◽  
Connected Discourse ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Relationship

An assessment was made of the strength and direction of the relationship between rated degree of familiarity for connected discourse and the extent of recall of such material. The experimental material consisted of two short passages of prose (a narrative and an argument) and of a rating scale containing all the sentences from these passages inserted randomly among other individual sentences selected from a wide range of sources. 20 Ss provided both recall scores for the passages (which were presented whole) and familiarity ratings for the sentences in the rating scale. When recall scores for the individual sentences were correlated with the mean ratings, a positive and significant value was found. The bearing of this finding on (he expectations of interference theory is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document