Supplemental Material for The Effects of Allowing a Second Sequential Lineup Lap on Choosing and Probative Value

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Horry ◽  
Neil Brewer ◽  
Nathan Weber ◽  
Matthew A. Palmer

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott D. Gronlund ◽  
Steven E. Clark ◽  
Curt A. Carlson ◽  
Charles A. Goodsell

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curt A. Carlson ◽  
Scott D. Gronlund ◽  
Shawn R. Singer ◽  
Debra L. Tower

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Philip Kaesler ◽  
John C Dunn ◽  
Keith Ransom ◽  
Carolyn Semmler

The debate regarding the best way to test and measure eyewitness memory has dominated the eyewitness literature for more than thirty years. We argue that to resolve this debate requires the development and application of appropriate measurement models. In this study we develop models of simultaneous and sequential lineup presentations and use these to compare the procedures in terms of discriminability and response bias. We tested a key prediction of the diagnostic feature detection hypothesis that discriminability should be greater for simultaneous than sequential lineups. We fit the models to the corpus of studies originally described by Palmer and Brewer (2012, Law and Human Behavior, 36(3), 247-255) and to data from a new experiment. The results of both investigations showed that discriminability did not differ between the two procedures, while responses were more conservative for sequential presentation compared to simultaneous presentation. We conclude that the two procedures do not differ in the efficiency with which they allow eyewitness memory to be expressed. We discuss the implications of this for the diagnostic feature detection hypothesis and other sequential lineup procedures used in current jurisdictions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2020) ◽  
pp. 266-291
Author(s):  
George-Alexandru STAN ◽  

"This paper is focused on establishing the legal regime of privileged wills. First of all, we will analyse the probative value of this type of will and we shall demonstrate that it is justified to assign it the probative value specific to authentic deeds. Second of all, given that we are in the presence of an authentic deed, we shall extract all the specific requirements in regard to the simplified authentication procedure starting from the provisions of the Romanian Civil Code. These should be complemented by the general regulations in the field of authentic deeds as regulated by the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, as well as with those compatible provisions regarding the authentication procedure applied by the public notary when authenticating wills. Subsequently, we will focus on the constrains regarding the incompatibility of the agent which manages the procedure and the requirements that must be met by the witnesses involved in the proceedings. Finally, we will undertake an analysis on the substantive conditions that privileged wills must meet and we will present the reasons why we agree with the opinion that supports the ability of the disposer to create a privileged will even if he could draw up a holographic will. Given the opportunity, we will also specify for how long the effects of a privileged will last in so far author could have also draw up a holographic will. Thus, we will demonstrate that the limited term whose fulfilment attracts expiration of the privileged will shall not start unless two cumulative conditions are met: the deceased is able to draw up a holographic will and the circumstance which allow him to draw up a privileged will have ceased to exist. On the contrary, it will be proven that the one who can address a public notary in order to create a will shall not be allowed to also create a valid privileged will."


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document