legal regime
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1657
(FIVE YEARS 720)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 30-42
Author(s):  
V. O. Makarov

Experimental legal regime; COVID19; legal regime; legal experiment; “regulatory sandboxes”; legal technique; classification of legal experiments; legality; experimental legal regimes of mobilization type on legal forecasting and legal interpretation methods. The theoretical basis of the research includes well-known legal science categories, i.e. legal regime and legal experiment that get a new interpretation with the appearance of experimental legal regime institute. The main results of the research, scope of application. Experimental legal regime is a broader legal phenomenon than regulatory sandboxes, which includes not only regulation of the digital innovation sphere, but also other rules that are limited in time and space. There are legal regimes with signs of experimentation that are not officially identified by the state as experimental legal regimes. The work studied the experience which arose due to  modern  changes  in  state  and  legal  regulation  caused  by  the  global  epidemic  of COVID-19. It is suggested to divide the legal experiments according to the purpose of experimental legislation into the following groups: optimizing, progressive and mobilization ones. The aim of the first group named “Optimizing legal experiments” is to test using of new regulation applied to a large and complex object. The second group named “Progressive legal experiments” is intended to check whether the abandonment of old laws is beneficial in the innovation field. The result is creation of a smart regulation for economic and technological development. The third group named “Mobilization legal experiments” is aimed at maintaining of the existing level of resources, security, and infrastructure in the event of critical situations. It is being proved that the legal restrictions aimed at preventing of COVID-19 viral infection spreading can be classified as experimental legal regimes of mobilization type. The criterion for distinguishing of mobilization experimental legal regimes from others is the voluntary participation in the legal experiment and the goal of the experimental legal regime.Conclusions. The development of mobilization experimental legal regimes implies raising of their legality. It can be achieved by the provision of legal guarantees such as the goals of the legal experiment and the evaluation of their consequences. This will allow identify whether the consequences of the experiment correspond to the goals of the new legal regulation. There must be grounds for limitations to legal certainty caused by legal experimentation. Their manifestation is the goal and evaluation criteria, with the help of which it is possible to determine whether the consequences of the establishment of the experiment correspond to the goals of the new legal regulation. Otherwise, there is a risk of unjustified infringement of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens.


Nuclear Law ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 161-171
Author(s):  
Bonnie Denise Jenkins

AbstractThe forthcoming arrival of small modular reactors and other advanced nuclear reactor technologies can be an immensely beneficial development in the world’s collective pursuit of energy security and meeting climate change objectives. The key question is whether or not these new reactor technologies significantly alter the fundamental premises underlying the existing nuclear security legal regime. The Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and its Amendment (A/CPPNM) are the only legally binding international instruments governing the physical protection of nuclear materials and nuclear facilities. Together the A/CPPNM and the international guidance on nuclear security comprise the current legal framework for nuclear security. This chapter examines whether the A/CPPNM adequately covers advanced reactor technologies; and whether the States that are interested in acquiring these new reactor technologies have the capacity to effectively implement the associated legal requirements, regulatory standards, and international guidance that comes along with such technologies. The analysis touches upon the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the IAEA Nuclear Security Guidance, and issues of cybersecurity.


Nuclear Law ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 55-73
Author(s):  
Stephen Burns

AbstractThe development of the nuclear legal framework has been an interesting journey reflecting a commitment to addressing the key aspects of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy through a variety of approaches using both binding treaties and conventions and non-binding codes and guidance. This complex framework of hard and soft law instruments has developed in response to action forcing events. Future development of the legal regime will be aided by greater harmonization and commitment to ensuring that institutions at an international and national level are transparent and willing to engage in constructive interaction with stakeholders. Legal advisers will continue to play an important role in assisting policy makers and technical experts in crafting comprehensive and effective approaches to further development of the framework for nuclear energy and its regulation. In those deliberations a number of key elements should be highlighted. This chapter suggests that elements are stakeholder trust, strong institutional capacity, and integration of international instruments and standards at national levels.


Jurnal HAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 533
Author(s):  
Tasya Safiranita ◽  
Travis Tio Pratama Waluyo ◽  
Elizabeth Calista ◽  
Danielle Putri Ratu ◽  
Ahmad M. Ramli

Cyberspace is the interdependent network of information technology infrastructures such as the internet, telecommunications networks, and computer systems. Meanwhile, Indonesia’s Law Number 11 of 2008 and its amendment through Indonesian Law Number 19 of 2016 governing cyberspace have been viewed to contradict and infringe other areas of law, such as protection of press or freedom of expression. Hence, this study seeks to identify the controversies and problems regarding the law deemed urgent for amendment. Further, this study creates recommendations so the government may amend electronic information policy more fairly and efficiently. This study uses a judicial normative and comparative approach. This research tries to analyze the existing regulations and the implementation and compare Indonesia’s cyberspace regulation with other States’. This study finds that Articles 27(3) and 28(2) of the law criminalize defamation and hate speech in an overly broad manner and that Article 40(2)(b) allows the government to exercise problematic censorship. As a result, they have infringed the freedom of the press and general freedom of expression in practice. In response to this, this study compares similar provisions from other States and recommends amendment the articles to become narrower and more clearly defined.


Author(s):  
Monica Martinez de Campos ◽  
Rui de Morais Damas

Housing is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution. As a structural element of family organisation, the family residence becomes a necessary instrument for achieving the minimum values ​​of human dignity in its family dimension. The Portuguese legal system that constitutionally enshrines the inviolability of the human person's dignity, the protection of the family and the right to housing, attributes a vulnerability to the family residence, allowing it to be seized, with very few exceptions. The "casal de família" institute, which finds its place in the North American Homestead, can recommend a feasible and possible solution to protect the family residence. Under Portuguese law, this institute was in force between 1920 and 1977, assuming the terminology of "casal de família". We will analyse the legal regime of Homestead and the modus operandi of the "casal de família" in Portugal. We wonder whether the Portuguese legal system should again consider the existence of "family property" or "family couple". We believe that such a concept would encourage the family, strengthen its values, strengthen its ties, and solve a pressing social problem, not resolved by the Portuguese law n ° 13/2016, of May 23.


Author(s):  
Victoria Slobodyan ◽  
Marina Polishchuk

Problem setting. The article examines issues related to property that is the personal private property of the wife, husband. Some problems and contradictions of the legal regime of personal private property are analyzed, according to the results of the analysis of which, one’s own position is stated. The case law on this issue is studied and its key aspects within the topic of the article are singled out. The thesis is proposed and argued that an effective way to establish the legal regime of property, according to which it will be the personal private property of a husband or wife can be a marriage contract. The practical significance of the obtained results is that they can be used: in the research field ‒ for further research on the problems of personal private property of spouses in family relationships; in law-making activity ‒ for improvement of provisions of the current legislation of Ukraine, at creation of new and modification of the operating domestic regulatory legal acts concerning the outlined problem; law enforcement activities ‒ by applying practical conclusions and recommendations in practice in matters relating to personal private property of husband, wife; in the educational process ‒ as a didactic support of certain topics in the discipline «Family Law of Ukraine». Analysis of recent researches and publications in which this problem was considered, showed that, in particular, such scientists as V.K. Antoshkina, V.I. Borisov, L. Vlasenko, E.M. Vorozheykin, N. Zagriya, I.V. Zhilinkova, A.O. Dutko, V.O. Kozhevnikova, L.V. Krasitska, V.A. Kreutor, O.M. Ponomarenko, O.V. Rozgon, O.I. Safonchik, O.V. Sinegubov, I.V. Spasibo-Fateeva, R.O. Stefanchuk, E.O. Fomina, S. Fursa, E. Fursa, E.A. Kharitonov, Y.S. Chervony, V.L. Yarotsky and others paid much attention to its various aspects. Target of research. Research of the legal nature and features of property that is the personal private property of the wife, husband. Article’s main body. According to the Family Code of Ukraine, the personal private property of the husband and wife are: 1) property acquired before marriage; 2) property acquired during the marriage, but on the basis of a contract of gift or by inheritance; 3) property acquired during the marriage, but for funds that belonged to one of the spouses personally; 4) housing acquired by one of the spouses during the marriage as a result of privatization in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On Privatization of State Housing”; 5) land acquired as a result of privatization, which was in his / her use, or obtained as a result of privatization of land of state and communal agricultural enterprises, institutions and organizations, or obtained from state and communal lands within the norms of free privatization defined by the Land Code Of Ukraine. In addition, the personal private property of the spouses is also things for individual use, ie things that each spouse personally uses daily or regularly. Here it is important to emphasize that there is no clearly defined list of such things in the current legislation. However, as a rule, these include clothing, perfumes, cosmetics, accessories, jewelry, personal hygiene products and more. Such items include, in particular, jewelry, even if they were purchased with common funds. However, in practice there are difficulties in what is to be understood by the concept of “jewelry”, because it is evaluative. In the event that the division of property of the spouses takes place in court, the court must decide in each case whether a particular thing is valuable. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Thus, property acquired before marriage is exclusively personal private property – marriage registration does not change the legal regime of property acquired separately by each spouse before marriage. In addition, such property retains a regime of separation regardless of the duration of the marriage, even if the property was used not only by the owner but by both spouses. As for the property acquired in marriage, it is possible to recognize it as personal private property, but this requires a lot of effort and substantiated evidence that confirms the fact that one of the spouses spent their personal money and specific property. We concluded that an effective way to avoid possible risks and protect spouses from future misunderstandings and disputes over property regimes is to conclude a marriage contract, which can not only resolve the property relations of husband and wife during marriage, but also prevent possible lawsuits. disputes over the division of property in the event of divorce.


Laws ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Vasiliy Andreevich Laptev ◽  
Inna Vladimirovna Ershova ◽  
Daria Rinatovna Feyzrakhmanova

Background: Cutting-edge digital technologies are being actively introduced into healthcare. The recent successful efforts of artificial intelligence in diagnosing, predicting and studying diseases, as well as in surgical assisting demonstrate its high efficiency. The AI’s ability to promptly take decisions and learn independently has motivated large corporations to focus on its development and gradual introduction into everyday life. Legal aspects of medical activities are of particular importance, yet the legal regulation of AI’s performance in healthcare is still in its infancy. The state is to a considerable extent responsible for the formation of a legal regime that would meet the needs of modern society (digital society). Objective: This study aims to determine the possible modes of AI’s functioning, to identify the participants in medical-legal relations, to define the legal personality of AI and circumscribe the scope of its competencies. Of importance is the issue of determining the grounds for imposing legal liability on persons responsible for the performance of an AI system. Results: The present study identifies the prospects for a legal assessment of AI applications in medicine. The article reviews the sources of legal regulation of AI, including the unique sources of law sanctioned by the state. Particular focus is placed on medical-legal customs and medical practices. Conclusions: The presented analysis has allowed formulating the approaches to the legal regulation of AI in healthcare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 146-163
Author(s):  
Anton Vasiliev ◽  
Evgeny Anichkin ◽  
Andrei Serebriakov

The publication presents the concept and content of the draft law of the Altai Territory, prepared by the team of authors – the draft law of the Altai Territory “On Science, Scientific-Technical Activity and Innovation Activity in the Altai Territory”. The paper notes the urgent need to update the legislation of the Altai Territory on science and innovations as a pillar for technological development and the growth of well-being of residents of the Altai Territory. The structure of the draft law includes general provisions, powers of state authorities of the Altai Territory in the field of science and innovations, measures to support scientific and innovative activities, the status of a scientist and the legal regime of innovation territories. Particular attention in the bill is given to a system of measures to support scientists and especially young scientists to retain talent in the Altai Territory.


2021 ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
E. S. Anichkin ◽  
A.A. Serebriakov

Modern processes of geopolitical, socio-economic development of states and the global economy requirethe intensification of scientific and technical cooperation within the framework of regional associations,which include developing countries. This is necessary for the transition from a resource-based economy to aknowledge economy and a significant improvement in the welfare of the population.Unfortunately, despitethe presence of appropriate prerequisites, scientific and technical cooperation between the member states ofthe Shanghai Cooperation Organization is extremely poorly developed.It seems that one of the reasons forthis is the absence of a convention document regulating in detail various aspects of cooperation in the areaunder consideration.The necessity of development and adoption of the Shanghai Cooperation OrganizationConvention on international scientific and scientific-technical cooperation is substantiated.It is proposed toinclude in this document the goals and principles of international scientific and technical cooperation, ruleson a permanent SCO body on international scientific and technical cooperation, provisions on financialsupport for scientific and technical cooperation, framework norms on the legal regime of territories ofadvanced scientific and scientific-technical development, as well as the norms disclosing the legal status ofparticipants in international scientific and scientific-technical cooperation.


Author(s):  
Kostiantyn Zerov

Keywords: artificial intelligence, copyright, related rights, sui generis The publication provides a descriptive review of existingtheoretical approaches regarding the legal protection of objects generated byartificial intelligence systems in the field of copyright and related rights, namely.1) The inexpediency of legal protection of computer-generated objects. It is concludedthat the absence of legal regulation and free circulation of generated objects isconsidered the easiest option. Still, hardly fair and justified, as the creation of artificialintelligence systems requires large and significant investments in their development.2) The possibility of protecting computer-generated objects by copyright as originalworks. It has been established that extending the concept of «originality» to computergeneratedobjects seems unjustifiable.3) The introduction of the latest iteration of the fiction theory and establishing aspecial legal status for artificial intelligence systems. It is noted that such an approachseems premature because the existing artificial intelligence systems are amanifestation of «narrow» or «weak» artificial intelligence and not artificial generalintelligence.4) Protection of specific generated objects through related rights. It is concludedthat the objects generated by AI systems may be protected in Ukraine through theprism of related rights, under the condition that the relevant object can be attributedto a phonogram, videogram, or broadcast (program) of broadcasters respectively.5) Protection of generated objects through a special legal regime under copyrightlaw. It is described that this approach cannot be considered a universal example forimitating the legal protection of objects generated by computer programs because itsapplication leaves more questions and inconsistencies than solving the problem onthe merits.6) Protection of generated objects through sui generis law. It is assumed that applyingsuch an approach to the protection of objects generated by computer programswill not lead to significant changes in copyright and will protect the interests and investmentsof developers of artificial intelligence systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document