Supplemental Material for Distributionally Weighted Least Squares in Structural Equation Modeling

2011 ◽  
Vol 130-134 ◽  
pp. 730-733
Author(s):  
Narong Phothi ◽  
Somchai Prakancharoen

This research proposed a comparison of accuracy based on data imputation between unconstrained structural equation modeling (Uncon-SEM) and weighted least squares (WLS) regression. This model is developed by University of California, Irvine (UCI) and measured using the mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE). Experimental data set is created using the waveform generator that contained 21 indicators (1,200 samples) and divided into two groups (1,000 for training and 200 for testing groups). In fact, training group was analyzed by three main factors (F1, F2, and F3) for creating the models. The result of the experiment show MMRE of Uncon-SEM method based on the testing group is 34.29% (accuracy is 65.71%). In contrast, WLS method produces MMRE for testing group is 55.54% (accuracy is 44.46%). So, Uncon-SEM is high accuracy and MMRE than WLS method that is 21.25%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Muhammad Amin Paris

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is one of multivariate techniques  that can estimates a series of interrelated dependence relationships from a number of endogenous and exogenous variables, as well as latent (unobserved) variables simultaneously. Estimation of Parameter methods that is often applied in SEM are Maximum Likelihood (ML), Weighted Least Squares (WLS), Unweighted Least Squares (ULS), Generalized Least Squares (GLS) and Partial Least Squares (PLS). This research aims to compare ULS method and PLS method in estimating parameter model of achievement of student learning in first year undergraduate Mathematics students, FMIPA, Bogor  Agricultural University ( IPB). This research use secondary and primary data which amounts to 112. The result of this research indicates that ULS method is more accurate than PLS methods. The analysis done with ULS method shows that motivation, capability and environmental had an effect to achievement of student learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1270-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Ross ◽  
Leslie Nuñez ◽  
Chinh Chu Lai

Students’ decisions to enter or persist in STEM courses is linked with their affective domain. The influence of factors impacting students’ affective domain in introductory college chemistry classes, such as attitude, is often overlooked by instructors, who instead focus on students’ mathematical abilities as sole predictors of academic achievement. The current academic barrier to enrollment in introductory college chemistry classes is typically a passing grade in a mathematics prerequisite class. However, mathematical ability is only a piece of the puzzle in predicting preparedness for college chemistry. Herein, students’ attitude toward the subject of chemistry was measured using the original Attitudes toward the Subject of Chemistry Inventory (ASCI). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to chart and monitor the development of students’ attitude toward the subject of chemistry during an introductory college chemistry course. Results from PLS-SEM support a 3-factor (intellectual accessibility,emotional satisfaction, andinterestandutility) structure, which could signal the distinct cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitude, according to its theoretical tripartite framework. Evidence of a low-involvement hierarchy of attitude effect is also presented herein. This study provides a pathway for instructors to identify at-risk students, exhibiting low affective characteristics, early in a course so that academic interventions are feasible. The results presented here have implications for the design and implementation of teaching strategies geared toward optimizing student achievement in introductory college chemistry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document