Supplemental Material for Illness Management and Recovery in Community Practice

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Illness Management ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery

scholarly journals Illness management and recovery in community practice.

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan B. McGuire ◽  
Tom Bartholomew ◽  
Adrienne I. Anderson ◽  
Sarah M. Bauer ◽  
John H. McGrew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Illness Management ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery

scholarly journals Identifying the minimal important difference in patient-reported outcome measures in the field of people with severe mental illness: a pre–post-analysis of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titus A. A. Beentjes ◽  
Steven Teerenstra ◽  
Hester Vermeulen ◽  
Peter J. J. Goossens ◽  
Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Minimal Important Difference ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Meaningful Change ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Complementary interventions for persons with severe mental illness (SMI) focus on both personal recovery and illness self-management. This paper aimed to identify the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) associated with the most relevant and meaningful change in persons with SMI who attended the Illness Management and Recovery Programme (IMR). Methods The effect of the IMR was measured with PROMs concerning recovery, illness self-management, burden of symptoms and quality of life (QoL). From the QoL measures, an anchor was chosen based on the most statistically significant correlations with the PROMs. Then, we estimated the minimal important difference (MID) for all PROMs using an anchor-based method supported by distribution-based methods. The PROM with the highest outcome for effect score divided by MID (the effect/MID index) was considered to be a measure of the most relevant and meaningful change. Results All PROMs showed significant pre–post-effects. The QoL measure ‘General Health Perception (Rand-GHP)’ was identified as the anchor. Based on the anchor method, the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) showed the highest effect/MID index, which was supported by the distribution-based methods. Because of the modifying gender covariate, we stratified the MID calculations. In most MIDs, the MHRM showed the highest effect/MID indexes. Conclusion Taking into account the low sample size and the gender covariate, we conclude that the MHRM was capable of showing the most relevant and meaningful change as a result of the IMR in persons with SMI.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of interpersonal community psychiatric treatment (ICPT) for people with long-term severe non-psychotic mental disorders: a multi-Centre randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark van Veen ◽  
Bauke Koekkoek ◽  
Steven Teerenstra ◽  
Eddy Adang ◽  
Cornelis L. Mulder
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Psychiatric Treatment ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Perceived Difficulty

Abstract Background Long-term community mental health treatment for non-psychotic disorder patients with severe mental illness (SMI) who are perceived as difficult by clinicians, is poorly developed and lacks a structured, goal-centred approach. This study compares (cost-)effectiveness of Interpersonal Community Psychiatric Treatment (ICPT) with Care As Usual (CAU) on quality of life and clinician perceived difficulty in the care for non-psychotic disorder SMI-patients. A multi-centre cluster-randomized clinical tria was conducted in which Community Mental Health Nurses (Clinicians) in three large community mental health services in the Netherlands were randomly allocated to providing either ICPT or CAU to included patients. A total of 56 clinicians were randomized, who treated a total of 93 patients (59 in ICPT-group and 34 in CAU-group). Methods Primary outcome measure is patient-perceived quality of life as measured by the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Secondary outcome measures include clinician-perceived difficulty, general mental health, treatment outcomes, illness management and recovery, therapeutic relationship, care needs and social network. Patients were assessed at baseline, during treatment (6 months), after treatment (12 months) and at 6 months follow-up (18 months). Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements were used to compare mean changes in primary and secondary outcomes between intervention and control group of patients over time on an intention to treat basis. Potential efficiency was investigated from a societal perspective. Economic evaluation was based on general principles of a cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcome measures for health economic evaluation, were costs, and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Results Half of the intended number of patients were recruited. There was no statistically significant treatment effect found in the MANSA (0.17, 95%-CI [− 0.058,0.431], p = 0.191). Treatment effects showed significant improvement in the Different Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire-scores and a significant increase in the Illness Management and Recovery–scale Client-version scores). No effects of ICPT on societal and medical costs nor QALYs were found. Conclusions This is the first RCT to investigate the (cost)-effectiveness of ICPT. Compared with CAU, ICPT did not improve quality of life, but significantly reduced clinician-perceived difficulty, and increased subjective illness management and recovery. No effects on costs or QALY’s were found. Trial registration NTR 3988, registered 13 May 2013.

scholarly journals A technology-assisted life of recovery from psychosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dror Ben-Zeev ◽  
Benjamin Buck ◽  
Sarah Kopelovich ◽  
Suzanne Meller
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Health Innovations ◽  
Schizophrenia Spectrum

Abstract Developments in digital health technologies have the potential to expedite and strengthen the path towards recovery for people with psychosis. This perspective piece provides a snapshot of how a range of digital technologies can be deployed to support a young adult’s efforts to cope with schizophrenia-spectrum illness. In conjunction with a day in the life of this individual, we provide examples of innovations in digital health research designed for this clinical population, as well as brief summaries of the evidence supporting the usability, feasibility, or effectiveness of each approach. From early detection to ongoing symptom management and vocational rehabilitation, this day-in-the-life vignette provides an overview of the ways in which digital health innovations could be used in concert to augment, scaffold, and enhance schizophrenia-spectrum illness management and recovery.

scholarly journals Impact of Illness Management and Recovery Programs on Hospital and Emergency Room Use by Medicaid Enrollees

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle P. Salyers ◽  
Angela L. Rollins ◽  
Daniel Clendenning ◽  
Alan B. McGuire ◽  
Edward Kim
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Programs

scholarly journals How to implement Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in mental health service settings: evaluation of the implementation strategy

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Myhren Egeland ◽  
Torleif Ruud ◽  
Terje Ogden ◽  
Rickard Färdig ◽  
Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery

Participants’ and staffs’ evaluation of the Illness Management and Recovery program: a randomized clinical trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helle Stentoft Dalum ◽  
Anna Kristine Waldemar ◽  
Lisa Korsbek ◽  
Carsten Hjorthøj ◽  
John Hagel Mikkelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Program

scholarly journals Consumer and provider responses to a computerized version of the Illness Management and Recovery Program.

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Wright-Berryman ◽  
Michelle P. Salyers ◽  
James P. O'Halloran ◽  
Aaron S. Kemp ◽  
Kim T. Mueser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Program
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document