Supplemental Material for Gender Differences in Response to Competition With Same-Gender Coworkers: A Relational Perspective


2016 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 869-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Young Lee ◽  
Selin Kesebir ◽  
Madan M. Pillutla


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Jaber-Lopez ◽  
Alexandra Baier ◽  
Brent J. Davis

AbstractWe examine gender differences when eliciting distributional preferences as conducted by the Equality Equivalence Test, which has the ability to classify subjects into preferences types. Preferences are elicited when individuals interact with an individual of the same gender and with an individual of the opposite gender. We find elicited preferences are robust across both in-group (same gender) and out-group (opposite gender) interactions. When analyzing the intensity of benevolence (or malevolence) we find that overall women exhibit more malevolence than men, but there is no gender difference for benevolence. Furthermore, women exhibit a higher level of in-group favoritism than men.



2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1179173X1987913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol B Cunradi ◽  
Juliet Lee ◽  
Anna Pagano ◽  
Raul Caetano ◽  
Harrison J Alter

Background: Urban emergency department (ED) patients have elevated smoking and substance use compared with the general population. We analyzed gender differences in smoking among an urban ED sample and assessed the contribution of substance use, demographic, and couple factors. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data obtained from a cross-sectional, observational survey (N = 1037 participants) on drinking, drug use, and intimate partner violence (IPV). Gender-specific logistic regression models for current (past 30-day) smoking and multinomial regression models for smoking intensity (light: ⩽5 cigarettes per day [CPD]; moderate: 6 to 10 CPD; heavier: >10 CPD) were estimated. Results: Smoking prevalence was higher among men than women (35.5% vs 18.9%; P < .001). Substance use (frequency of intoxication, marijuana, amphetamine, and cocaine use), demographic (food insufficiency, unemployment), and couple-related factors (having a spouse/partner who smoked, IPV involvement, being in a same-gender couple) were differentially associated with current smoking and level of intensity among men and women. Conclusions: Emergency department staff should consider the impact of polysubstance use, food insufficiency, unemployment, and whether both partners in the couple smoke when screening patients for smoking and formulating cessation treatment plans. Women in same-gender relationships and those who have experienced IPV involvement may require additional referral.





2014 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Joiner ◽  
Caroline Stewart ◽  
Chelsey Beaney ◽  
Amy Moon ◽  
Pam Maras ◽  
...  


Sex Roles ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 709-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Duck ◽  
Paul H. Wright


2014 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Sinclair ◽  
Rickard Carlsson ◽  
Fredrik Björklund


1993 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. S9-S16 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Lee ◽  
J. W. Dwyer ◽  
R. T. Coward




2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (21) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
BETSY BATES
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document