Expectations for Experiencing Role Strain Measure

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan M. Barth ◽  
Sarah Dunlap ◽  
Kelsey Chappetta
Keyword(s):  
1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace K. Baruch ◽  
Rosalind C. Barnett

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert Hayslip ◽  
Heidemarie Blumenthal ◽  
Ashley Garner

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Graham Sterling ◽  
Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway ◽  
Daniel Cox ◽  
Jeffery Martin ◽  
Farrah Greene ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R. Walen ◽  
Margie E. Lachman

2020 ◽  
pp. 108128652097275
Author(s):  
Miroslav Šilhavý

The paper presents a coordinate-free analysis of deformation measures for shells modeled as 2D surfaces. These measures are represented by second-order tensors. As is well-known, two types are needed in general: the surface strain measure (deformations in tangential directions), and the bending strain measure (warping). Our approach first determines the 3D strain tensor E of a shear deformation of a 3D shell-like body and then linearizes E in two smallness parameters: the displacement and the distance of a point from the middle surface. The linearized expression is an affine function of the signed distance from the middle surface: the absolute term is the surface strain measure and the coefficient of the linear term is the bending strain measure. The main result of the paper determines these two tensors explicitly for general shear deformations and for the subcase of Kirchhoff-Love deformations. The derived surface strain measures are the classical ones: Naghdi’s surface strain measure generally and its well-known particular case for the Kirchhoff-Love deformations. With the bending strain measures comes a surprise: they are different from the traditional ones. For shear deformations our analysis provides a new tensor [Formula: see text], which is different from the widely used Naghdi’s bending strain tensor [Formula: see text]. In the particular case of Kirchhoff–Love deformations, the tensor [Formula: see text] reduces to a tensor [Formula: see text] introduced earlier by Anicic and Léger (Formulation bidimensionnelle exacte du modéle de coque 3D de Kirchhoff–Love. C R Acad Sci Paris I 1999; 329: 741–746). Again, [Formula: see text] is different from Koiter’s bending strain tensor [Formula: see text] (frequently used in this context). AMS 2010 classification: 74B99


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document