Online Brand Community Social Capital Scale

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Meek ◽  
Maria Ryan ◽  
Claire Lambert ◽  
Madeleine Ogilvie
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheolho Yoon ◽  
Changkyu Kim ◽  
Sanghoon Kim ◽  
Il-Kyu Park

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 922-936
Author(s):  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Zhimin Zhou ◽  
Ge Zhan ◽  
Nan Zhou

Although online communities with a supportive climate encourage members to participate and exchange their information openly and freely, participants may perceive the community to be unsafe without proper control. Do controlling climates also contribute to the accumulation of social capital in online brand communities (OBCs)? The purpose of our study was to investigate how controlling and supportive climates jointly influence community identification, and to examine the mediating effects of social capital and the moderating effects of community age. A conceptual framework was proposed and tested with data collected from an online survey of 481 online brand community members. We found that both controlling and supportive climates had positive effects on social capital (trust and norms of reciprocity), which exerted a partial mediation between community climate and community identification in the OBCs examined. Developing a community climate was particularly effective in generating trust in older communities. This research contributes to the community literature and has important implications for community climate management. We identified the boundary conditions of the community climate-trust association.


2019 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 234-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Meek ◽  
Maria Ryan ◽  
Claire Lambert ◽  
Madeleine Ogilvie

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuğba Özbölük ◽  
Yunus Dursun

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the different types of members based on their roles within an online brand community dedicated to Apple. Design/methodology/approach Design/methodology/approach Data are drawn from an 18-month netnographic study, including participant and non-participant observation. Findings Findings reveal that members of the online brand community share a common goal but they are heterogeneous in many respects. In this research, five different types of brand community members are identified: learner, pragmatist, activist, opinion leader and evangelist. These findings emphasize the heterogeneity of the brand community or the differences of members and subgroups they form in the community. Practical implications This paper offers some insights for brand managers. There are different sub-tribes in online brand communities and these sub-tribes develop their own meanings of the brand. This means that online brand communities do not form one single homogenous target group and can be segmented into subgroups. Findings also offer a deeper understanding of negative characteristics of online brand community members. The role “activist” found in this study may be crucial for marketers, as activists can represent the negative side of online brand communities. Originality/value The literature on brand communities has focused predominantly on the homogeneity of these communities. This paper extends the literature by demonstrating the heterogeneity in an online brand community. The paper contributes to the brand community literature by substantiating that online brand community members can be segmented into subgroups based on their roles within the community. In addition, the paper extends the existing literature on brand communities that has overlooked the destructive consumer roles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document