scholarly journals A spacing account of negative recency in final free recall.

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1180-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel R. Kuhn ◽  
Lynn J. Lohnas ◽  
Michael J. Kahana
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nichole Bouffard ◽  
Jared Stokes ◽  
Hannah J. Kramer ◽  
Arne D. Ekstrom

1978 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. E. Richardson

Previous research has shown that the imageability of stimulus material affects the secondary memory (SM) component of free recall, but not the primary memory (PM) component, and that a negative recency effect is only observed for material of high imageability. It was found that interactive imagery instructions affected the SM component, but not the PM component; separative imagery instructions led to an increased PM component and a reduced SM component. A negative recency effect can be observed in an initial, delayed recall test. However, it is removed by imagery mnemonic instructions. This supports the idea that the negative recency effect is caused by the fact that subjects do not normally image the last few words presented in a free-recall task.


1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-339
Author(s):  
Ovid J. L. Tzeng ◽  
Barbara A. Hergatt

1974 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 812-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory F. Mazuryk

1970 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 554-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fergus I.M. Craik ◽  
John M. Gardiner ◽  
Michael J. Watkins

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document