scholarly journals Osmium isotope evidence for a large Late Triassic impact event

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Honami Sato ◽  
Tetsuji Onoue ◽  
Tatsuo Nozaki ◽  
Katsuhiko Suzuki
Geology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony S. Cohen ◽  
Angela L. Coe ◽  
Stephen M. Harding ◽  
Lorenz Schwark

Geology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 583-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bottini ◽  
A. S. Cohen ◽  
E. Erba ◽  
H. C. Jenkyns ◽  
A. L. Coe

1992 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 3531-3537 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P Dickin ◽  
J.M Richardson ◽  
J.H Crocket ◽  
R.H McNutt ◽  
W.V Peredery

Nature ◽  
10.1038/32397 ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 392 (6672) ◽  
pp. 171-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Spray ◽  
Simon P. Kelley ◽  
David B. Rowley

2008 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN SCHMIEDER ◽  
ELMAR BUCHNER

AbstractIsotopic and stratigraphic ages of the ~ 80 km diameter Puchezh-Katunki (Russia; 220 ± 10 to 167 ± 3 Ma) and the ~ 20 km diameter Obolon (Ukraine; 215 ± 25 to 169 ± 7 Ma) impact structures are associated with significant age uncertainties. As a case study, reconstructions of the palaeogeography at the time of crater formation (Late Triassic to Middle Jurassic) based on recent palaeogeographic maps help further to constrain impact ages. Palaeogeographic studies suggest that Puchezh-Katunki is older than 170 Ma and that Obolon is younger than 185 Ma. This also rules out that Obolon formed during a ~ 214 Ma Late Triassic multiple impact event as recently discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 572 ◽  
pp. 117111
Author(s):  
Delphine Klaessens ◽  
Laurie Reisberg ◽  
David Jousselin ◽  
Marguerite Godard ◽  
Claire Aupart

Geology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M.D. Day ◽  
D. Graham Pearson ◽  
Colin G. Macpherson ◽  
David Lowry ◽  
Juan-Carlos Carracedo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document