mantle plume
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

716
(FIVE YEARS 190)

H-INDEX

84
(FIVE YEARS 9)

2022 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 105033
Author(s):  
Tatyana V. Svetlitskaya ◽  
Thi Huong Ngo ◽  
Peter A. Nevolko ◽  
Tuan Anh Tran ◽  
Andrey E. Izokh ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Stein ◽  
Seth Stein ◽  
Molly M. Gallahue ◽  
Reece P. Elling

ABSTRACT Classic models proposed that continental rifting begins at hotspots—domal uplifts with associated magmatism—from which three rift arms extend. Rift arms from different hotspots link up to form new plate boundaries, along which the continent breaks up, generating a new ocean basin and leaving failed arms, termed aulacogens, within the continent. In subsequent studies, hotspots became increasingly viewed as manifestations of deeper upwellings or plumes, which were the primary cause of continental rifting. We revisited this conceptual model and found that it remains useful, though some aspects require updates based on subsequent results. First, the rift arms are often parts of boundaries of transient microplates accommodating motion between the major plates. The microplates form as continents break up, and they are ultimately incorporated into one of the major plates, leaving identifiable fossil features on land and/or offshore. Second, much of the magmatism associated with rifting is preserved either at depth, in underplated layers, or offshore. Third, many structures formed during rifting survive at the resulting passive continental margins, so study of one can yield insight into the other. Fourth, hotspots play at most a secondary role in continental breakup, because most of the associated volcanism reflects plate divergence, so three-arm junction points may not reflect localized upwelling of a deep mantle plume.


2022 ◽  
pp. 167-188
Author(s):  
Christiano Magini ◽  
Thomas F.C. Campos ◽  
Leonardo Mairink Barão ◽  
Susanna E. Sichel

2022 ◽  
pp. 105097
Author(s):  
Jingyi Qin ◽  
Zhaochong Zhang ◽  
Tong Hou ◽  
Zhiguo Cheng ◽  
Qiuhong Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gülcher ◽  
Laurent Montési ◽  
Taras Gerya ◽  
Jessica Munch

In the absence of global plate tectonics, mantle convection and plume-lithosphere interaction are the main drivers of surface deformation on Venus. Among documented tectonic structures, circular volcano-tectonic features known as coronae may be the clearest surface manifestations of mantle plumes and hold clues to the global Venusian tectonic regime. Yet, the exact processes underlying coronae formation and the reasons for their diverse morphologies remain controversial. Here, we use 3D thermomechanical numerical simulations of impingement of a thermal mantle plume upon the Venusian lithosphere to assess the origin and diversity of large Venusian coronae. The ability of the mantle plume to penetrate into the Venusian lithosphere results in four main outcomes: lithospheric dripping, short-lived subduction, embedded plume and plume underplating. During the first three scenarios, plume penetration and spreading induce crustal thickness variations that eventually lead to a final topographic isostasy-driven topographic inversion from circular trenches surrounding elevated interiors to raised rims surrounding inner depressions, as observed on many Venusian coronae. Different corona structures may represent not only different styles of plume-lithosphere interactions, but also different stages in evolution. A morphological analysis of large existing coronae leads to the conclusion that least 37 large coronae (including the largest Artemis corona) are active, providing evidence for widespread ongoing plume activity on Venus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document