scholarly journals Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

Eye ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Savini ◽  
Nicole Balducci ◽  
Claudio Carbonara ◽  
Scipione Rossi ◽  
Manuel Altieri ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Makoto Inoue ◽  
Nina Teresa Aicher ◽  
Yuji Itoh ◽  
Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima ◽  
Akito Hirakata

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert C. Giers ◽  
Ramin Khoramnia ◽  
Dorottya Varadi ◽  
Hannah Wallek ◽  
Hyeck Soo Son ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Evaluation of clinical and functional results of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF-IOL). Methods: Fourteen cataract patients (twenty-eight bilateral implantations) were assessed for uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities; uncorrected (UNVA), distance-corrected (DCNVA) and best corrected (CNVA) near visual acuities; and uncorrected (UIVA) and distance-corrected (DCIVA) intermediate visual acuities - as well as binocular defocus curves. Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity was recorded. Reading acuity was evaluated using an electronic reading desk at fixed distances and at the patient’s preferred near and intermediate distances. Visual symptoms were assessed with a halo and glare simulator plus a patient questionnaire which also recorded quality of life. Results: Median postoperative monocular UDVA was 0.13logMAR (range -0.08 to 0.42logMAR), median CDVA was -0.01logMAR (range -0.20 to 0.22logMAR), median UIVA at 80 cm was -0.05logMAR (range -0.18 to 0.58logMAR) and median UNVA at 40 cm was 0.14logMAR (range -0.10 to 0.64logMAR). Binocular uncorrected reading acuity was 0.10logMAR at 40 cm and 0.11logMAR at 80 cm. Patients preferred a median intermediate reading distance of 62.8 cm over the predetermined 80 cm, which allowed them to read smaller letter size but did not improve reading acuity. Patients reported a high rate of spectacle independence and satisfaction in everyday life and little to no dysphotopsia. Conclusion: The Mini WELL Ready IOL provided good postoperative functional results at far and intermediate distances and improved the visual and reading acuity at reading distance. The lens caused little to no dysphotopsia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert C. Giers ◽  
Ramin Khoramnia ◽  
Dorottya Varadi ◽  
Hannah Wallek ◽  
Hyeck-Soo Son ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhivanan Nivean ◽  
Pratheeba Devi Nivean ◽  
Jagadeesh Kumar Reddy ◽  
Kavithaa Ramamoorthy ◽  
Nishanth Madhivanan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 1911-1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Lins de Medeiros ◽  
Andre Gustavo de Araujo Rolim ◽  
Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta ◽  
Bruna Vieira Ventura ◽  
César Vilar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente J. Camps ◽  
Angel Tolosa ◽  
David P. Piñero ◽  
Dolores de Fez ◽  
María T. Caballero ◽  
...  

Purpose. To analyze the “in vitro” aberrometric pattern of a refractive IOL and two extended depth of focus IOLs.Methods. A special optical bench with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SH) was designed for the measurement. Three presbyopia correction IOLs were analyzed: Mini WELL (MW), TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 (SYM), and Lentis Mplus X LS-313 MF30 (MP). Three different pupil sizes were used for the comparison: 3, 4, and 4.7 mm.Results. MW generated negative primary and positive secondary spherical aberrations (SA) for the apertures of 3 mm (−0.13 and +0.12 μm), 4 mm (−0.12 and +0.08 μm), and 4.7 mm (−0.11 and +0.08 μm), while the SYM only generated negative primary SA for 4 and 4.7 mm apertures (−0.12 μm and −0.20 μm, resp.). The MP induced coma and trefoil for all pupils and showed significant HOAs for apertures of 4 and 4.7 mm.Conclusions.In an optical bench, the MW induces negative primary and positive secondary SA for all pupils. The SYM aberrations seem to be pupil dependent; it does not produce negative primary SA for 3 mm but increases for higher pupils. Meanwhile, the HOAs for the MW and SYM were not significant. The MP showed in all cases the highest HOAs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-445
Author(s):  
Moonjung Choi ◽  
Chan Young Im ◽  
Jin Ki Lee ◽  
Hyung-il Kim ◽  
Hyo Soon Park ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document