Inspecting treatment benefit in clinical drug trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Ananya Rastogi
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. i601-i609
Author(s):  
Joske Ubels ◽  
Tilman Schaefers ◽  
Cornelis Punt ◽  
Henk-Jan Guchelaar ◽  
Jeroen de Ridder

Abstract Motivation When phase III clinical drug trials fail their endpoint, enormous resources are wasted. Moreover, even if a clinical trial demonstrates a significant benefit, the observed effects are often small and may not outweigh the side effects of the drug. Therefore, there is a great clinical need for methods to identify genetic markers that can identify subgroups of patients which are likely to benefit from treatment as this may (i) rescue failed clinical trials and/or (ii) identify subgroups of patients which benefit more than the population as a whole. When single genetic biomarkers cannot be found, machine learning approaches that find multivariate signatures are required. For single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiles, this is extremely challenging owing to the high dimensionality of the data. Here, we introduce RAINFOREST (tReAtment benefIt prediction using raNdom FOREST), which can predict treatment benefit from patient SNP profiles obtained in a clinical trial setting. Results We demonstrate the performance of RAINFOREST on the CAIRO2 dataset, a phase III clinical trial which tested the addition of cetuximab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and concluded there was no benefit. However, we find that RAINFOREST is able to identify a subgroup comprising 27.7% of the patients that do benefit, with a hazard ratio of 0.69 (P = 0.04) in favor of cetuximab. The method is not specific to colorectal cancer and could aid in reanalysis of clinical trial data and provide a more personalized approach to cancer treatment, also when there is no clear link between a single variant and treatment benefit. Availability and implementation The R code used to produce the results in this paper can be found at github.com/jubels/RAINFOREST. A more configurable, user-friendly Python implementation of RAINFOREST is also provided. Due to restrictions based on privacy regulations and informed consent of participants, phenotype and genotype data of the CAIRO2 trial cannot be made freely available in a public repository. Data from this study can be obtained upon request. Requests should be directed toward Prof. Dr. H.J. Guchelaar ([email protected]). Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


1995 ◽  
Vol 90 (429) ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Ralph B. D'Agostino ◽  
Alain Spriet ◽  
Therese Dupin-Spriet ◽  
Pierre Simon ◽  
Robert Coluzzi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
Roosy Aulakh ◽  
Chander Shekhar Gautam ◽  
Prabhjot Singh Cheema

ABSTRACT Health care law is totally localized in its nature, but research for the development of new drugs has crossed man-made geographical limits. Weaker legal sanctions, poverty, illiteracy and inaccessibility to legal system have all contributed to make India a favored hub for contact research organizations. Many recent clinical drug trials in India have sparked controversy. However, in India today, we are more bothered about animal protection, but show little concern for volunteers in human trials. It is gradually becoming difficult to conduct research on animals; however, research on human beings is far easier. Sanctions against violation of rights of human volunteers in clinical trials are often only a perceived phenomenon. They are not protected as they should be. Regulatory framework needs thorough introspection, debate, reconsideration and strict implementation. These guidelines should not only be recommendatory but mandatory in nature and those who indulge in violations, shall be punished as per the law of the land effectively. How to cite this article Gautam CS, Aulakh R, Cheema PS. Clinical Drug Trials on Human Beings viz-a-viz Sanctions related to Animal Experimentation: Need to do Introspection? J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2012;46(3):113-116.


1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lissy F. Jarvik ◽  
Leonard Berg ◽  
Raymond Bartus ◽  
Leonard Heston ◽  
Nancy Leith ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-17
Author(s):  
Linda Teri ◽  
Rebecca G. Logsdon

Selecting outcome measures that are both psychometrically sound and sensitive to change is a very important aspect of clinical outcome research. A variety of measures have been introduced in recent years to assess behavioral complications in dementia, but few have been adequately tested in clinical trials. This article provides a discussion of factors to consider in selecting measures, including psychometrics, item content, assessment source, and sensitivity to change. A review of behavioral and psychiatric measures for dementia patients is provided, including measures of general behavioral disturbance, and measures specifically developed for agitation and depression. Each measure's psychometric characteristics, prior use with demented patients, and strengths and weaknesses with regard to treatment outcome research is summarized. The importance of linking measures to the investigators’ hypotheses is discussed, along with recommendations for evaluating and selecting outcome measures depending on the needs of the specific investigation. ( J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1995; 8(suppl 1):S8–S17).


2015 ◽  
pp. 485-499
Author(s):  
Pat Gillis ◽  
Emma whitby

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document