Chapter 5. Disease Advocacy Organisations

Author(s):  
Sharon F. Terry ◽  
Caroline Kant
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
pp. 43-66
Author(s):  
Rachel Kahn Best

In the second half of the twentieth century, disease advocacy evolved from universal campaigns to patients’ constituencies. Changes in the experience of health and illness and the nationwide expansion of political advocacy laid the groundwork for patient-led campaigns. Then, AIDS and breast cancer activists constructed a new type of disease advocacy on the foundations of the gay rights and women’s health movements. Unlike the earlier disease crusades, these movements were led by patients banding together to fight diseases that affected them personally, and they blazed a trail for patients suffering from other diseases. As patients’ activism became increasingly legitimate, disease nonprofits proliferated, patients took over congressional hearings, and disease walks and ribbons became an inescapable feature of American public life.


Rare Diseases ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yashodhara Bhattacharya ◽  
Gayatri Iyer ◽  
Aruna Priya Kamireddy ◽  
Subhadra Poornima ◽  
Keerthi Konda Juturu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Landy ◽  
Margaret A. Brinich ◽  
Mary Ellen Colten ◽  
Elizabeth J. Horn ◽  
Sharon F. Terry ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 780-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Kahn Best

In the 1980s and 1990s, single-disease interest groups emerged as an influential force in U.S. politics. This article explores their effects on federal medical research priority-setting. Previous studies of advocacy organizations’ political effects focused narrowly on direct benefits for constituents. Using data on 53 diseases over 19 years, I find that in addition to securing direct benefits, advocacy organizations have aggregate effects and can systemically change the culture of policy arenas. Disease advocacy reshaped funding distributions, changed the perceived beneficiaries of policies, promoted metrics for commensuration, and made cultural categories of worth increasingly relevant to policymaking.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Shilton ◽  
Beatriz Champagne ◽  
Claire Blanchard ◽  
Lorena Ibarra ◽  
Vijj Kasesmup

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon F Terry ◽  
Elizabeth J Horn ◽  
Joan Scott ◽  
Patrick F Terry

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Edwards ◽  
Sharon F. Terry ◽  
Dana Gold ◽  
Elizabeth J. Horn ◽  
Mary Schwartz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Coetzee ◽  
Mad Price Ball ◽  
Marc Boutin ◽  
Abby Bronson ◽  
David T. Dexter ◽  
...  

UNSTRUCTURED Sharing clinical trial data can provide value to research participants and communities by accelerating the development of new knowledge and therapies as investigators merge data sets to conduct new analyses, reproduce published findings to raise standards for original research, and learn from the work of others to generate new research questions. As a voice for the perspective of participants in clinical trials, nonprofit funders – including disease advocacy and patient-focused organizations – play a pivotal role in the promotion and implementation of data sharing policies. Funders are uniquely positioned to promote and support a culture of data sharing by serving as trusted liaisons between potential research participants and investigators who wish to access these participant networks for clinical trial recruitment. In short, nonprofit funders can drive policies and influence research culture. The purpose of this statement is to detail a set of aspirational goals and forward-thinking, collaborative solutions to data sharing for nonprofit funders to fold into existing funding policies. The goals in this statement convey the complexity of the opportunities and challenges facing nonprofit funders and the appropriate prioritization of data sharing within their organizations and may serve as a starting point for a data sharing “toolkit” for nonprofit funders of clinical trials, to provide the clarity of mission and mechanisms to enforce the data sharing practices their communities already expect are happening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document