scholarly journals Orthographic Learning in Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malin Wass ◽  
Teresa Y. C. Ching ◽  
Linda Cupples ◽  
Hua-Chen Wang ◽  
Björn Lyxell ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationship between orthographic learning and language, reading, and cognitive skills in 9-year-old children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) and to compare their performance to age-matched typically hearing (TH) controls. Method Eighteen children diagnosed with moderate-to-profound hearing loss who use hearing aids and/or cochlear implants participated. Their performance was compared with 35 age-matched controls with typical hearing. Orthographic learning was evaluated using a spelling task and a recognition task. The children were assessed on measures of reading ability, language, working memory, and paired-associate learning. Results On average, the DHH group performed more poorly than the TH controls on the spelling measure of orthographic learning, but not on the recognition measure. For both groups of children, there were significant correlations between orthographic learning and phonological decoding and between visual–verbal paired-associate learning and orthographic learning. Conclusions Although the children who are DHH had lower scores in the spelling test of orthographic learning than their TH peers, measures of their reading ability revealed that they acquired orthographic representations successfully. The results are consistent with the self-teaching hypothesis in suggesting that phonological decoding is important for orthographic learning.

1969 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 803-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
William P. Wallace

Three experiments were reported which investigated transfer from paired-associate (PA) learning to a recognition task (RL). Exp. I demonstrated that learning a PA list of A-B associates increased recognition errors to B words in RL (B words occurred a single time late in RL and A words occurred early in RL). It was argued that the appearance of the A words elicited the B associates implicitly, and this led to increased difficulty in identifying B words as first occurrences. An attempt to decrease RL errors to B words by interpolating unlearning activities between the A-B list and RL were unsuccessful (Exp. II). Exp. III demonstrated that the major portion of the increased errors to B words following PA learning was due to general PA-RL confusion and that specific A-B elicitations during RL added only slightly to this general confusion.


1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 1279-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred W. Ohnmacht ◽  
Richard Brody ◽  
John O'Connor

43 Ss were administered a false-recognition task, and a paired-associate learning task. Half the Ss were given a reversal shift task and the rest a nonreversal task. The paired-associate task was found to be unrelated to both the reversal and nonreversal tasks, whereas the false-recognition task was significantly related to the reversal shift but not to the nonreversal task. False recognition was also significantly related to the initial discrimination learned in the reversal shift, nonreversal shift paradigm. These results are interpreted in terms of a two-stage recognition model.


2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eylul Tekin ◽  
Henry L. Roediger

Abstract. Recent studies have shown that judgments of learning (JOLs) are reactive measures in paired-associate learning paradigms. However, evidence is scarce concerning whether JOLs are reactive in other paradigms. In old/new recognition experiments, we investigated the reactivity effects of JOLs in a levels-of-processing (LOP) paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, for each word, subjects saw a yes/no orienting question followed by the target word and a response. Then, they either did or did not make a JOL. The yes/no questions were about target words’ appearances, rhyming properties, or category memberships. In Experiment 3, for each word, subjects gave a pleasantness rating or counted the letter “e ”. Our results revealed that JOLs enhanced recognition across all orienting tasks in Experiments 1 and 2, and for the e-counting task in Experiment 3. This reactive effect was salient for shallow tasks, attenuating – but not eliminating – the LOP effect after making JOLs. We conclude that JOLs are reactive in LOP paradigms and subjects encode words more effectively when providing JOLs.


1976 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J. Treat ◽  
Hayne W. Reese

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document