scholarly journals Local nitric oxide release does not affect tachyphylaxis to angiotensin II in dorsal hand veins in man in the presence of prostaglandin synthesis inhibition

2002 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. de Haas ◽  
I. B. Wilkinson ◽  
J. L. Boyd ◽  
D. J. Webb
Placenta ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (5-6) ◽  
pp. A43
Author(s):  
A. Ahmed ◽  
M. Shams ◽  
J.S. Zhu ◽  
M.J. Whittle ◽  
X-F. Li

1998 ◽  
Vol 435 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thorup ◽  
Mark Kornfeld ◽  
Joseph M. Winaver ◽  
Michael S. Goligorsky ◽  
Leon C. Moore

1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1046-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Takenaka ◽  
K D Mitchell ◽  
L G Navar

This study was performed to evaluate the contribution of angiotensin II to the effects of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis inhibition on renal hemodynamics and excretory function in rats. Intravenous infusion of N omega-nitro-L-arginine (NLA; 20 micrograms/100 g.min) increased renal arterial pressure (RAP) from 128 +/- 2 to 143 +/- 3 mm Hg (P < 0.05; N = 6) and decreased RBF by 64 +/- 3% (P < 0.01) and GFR by 41 +/- 5% (P < 0.05). In response to reduction of RAP to control levels (127 +/- 2 mm Hg) by means of an adjustable clamp (CL) placed on the suprarenal aorta, RBF and GFR exhibited efficient autoregulation and were not altered. In rats (N = 6) pretreated with the AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan (10 mg/kg iv), the infusion of NLA increased RAP (from 114 +/- 1 to 135 +/- 2 mm Hg; P < 0.05) and decreased RBF by 42 +/- 3% (P < 0.05). However, NLA did not decrease GFR in the losartan-treated rats. As in the control rats, the reduction of RAP to 113 +/- 1 mm Hg elicited autoregulatory responses that maintained RBF and GFR. In the untreated rats, at similar RAP (128 +/- 2 (control) versus 127 +/- 2 mm Hg (NLA+CL)). NO synthesis inhibition decreased urine flow and sodium excretion (P < 0.05, in both cases). However, during blockade of AT1 receptors, NLA infusion failed to decrease urine flow and sodium excretion, even when RAP was controlled (114 +/- 1 (control) versus 113 +/- 1 mm Hg (NLA+CL)).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-491
Author(s):  
NATHALIE HILL-KAPTURCZAK ◽  
MATTHIAS H. KAPTURCZAK ◽  
EDWARD R. BLOCK ◽  
JAWAHARLAL M. PATEL ◽  
TADEUSZ MALINSKI ◽  
...  

Abstract. In this study, a nitric oxide (NO) sensor was used to examine the ability of angiotensin II (AngII), AngIV, and bradykinin (Bk) to stimulate NO release from porcine pulmonary artery (PPAE) and porcine aortic endothelial (PAE) cells and to explore the mechanism of the AngII-stimulated NO release. Physiologic concentrations of AngII, but not Bk, caused release of NO from PPAE cells. In contrast, Bk, but not AngII, stimulated NO release from PAE cells. AngII-stimulated NO release from PPAE cells required extracellular L-arginine and was inhibited by L-nitro-arginine methyl ester. AT1 and AT2 receptor inhibition had no affect on AngII-mediated NO release or activation of NO synthase (NOS). AngIV, and AngII metabolite with binding sites that are pharmacologically distinct from the classic AngII receptors, stimulated considerably greater NO release and greater endothelial-type constitutive NOS activity than the same amount of AngII. The AngIV receptor antagonist, divalinal AngIV, blocked both AngII- and AngIV-mediated NO release as well as NOS activation. The results demonstrate that AngIV and the AngIV receptor are responsible, at least in part, for AngII-stimulated NO release and the associated endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. Furthermore, these results suggest that differences exist in both AngII- and Bk-mediated NO release between PPAE and PAE cells, which may reflect important differences in response to these hormones between vascular beds.


Hypertension ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leszek Kalinowski ◽  
Tomasz Matys ◽  
Ewa Chabielska ◽  
Włodzimierz Buczko ◽  
Tadeusz Malinski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document