Sexual satisfaction after penile prosthesis insertion for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

1998 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhojwani ◽  
Jain ◽  
Kockelbergh ◽  
Terry
Keyword(s):  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Sexual Satisfaction ◽  
Penile Prosthesis

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes after penile prosthesis placement for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction: a single-Centre experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentine Frydman ◽  
Ugo Pinar ◽  
Maher Abdessater ◽  
William Akakpo ◽  
Pietro Grande ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Penile Prosthesis ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Satisfactory Outcome ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Few Data

Abstract Background Penile prothesis (PP) is the gold-standard treatment of drug-refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). While postoperative outcomes have been widely described in the literature, there are few data about patient satisfaction and intraoperative events. We aimed to assess long-term patient satisfaction and perioperative outcomes after PP implantation in a single-centre cohort of unselected patients using validated scales. Results A total of 130 patients received a PP (median age: 62.5 years [IQR: 58–69]; median International Index of Erectile Function (IEEF-5) score: 6 [IQR: 5–7]). Median follow-up was 6.3 years [IQR: 4–9.4]. Thirty-two (24.6%) patients underwent surgical revision, of which 20 were PP removals (15.4%). Global PP survival rate was 84.6% and previous PP placement was a risk factor for PP removal (p = 0.02). There were six (4.6%) non-life-threatening intraoperative events including two which resulted in non-placement of a PP (1.5%). EAUiaic grade was 0 for 124 procedures (95.4%), 1 for four procedures (3.1%) and 2 for two procedures (1.5%). Of patients who still had their PP at the end of the study, 91 (80.5%) expressed satisfaction. Conclusions PP implantation is a last-resort treatment for ED with a satisfactory outcome. PPs are well accepted by patients.

The Penile Prosthesis Option for Erectile Dysfunction

2010 ◽  
pp. 195-206
Author(s):  
Fikret Erdemir ◽  
Andrew Harbin ◽  
Wayne J. G. Hellstrom
Keyword(s):  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Penile Prosthesis

scholarly journals Penile Prosthesis Placement with Immediate Buried Penis Correction: A Retrospective Chart Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Salgado ◽  
Christopher J. Salgado ◽  
Genesis Navas ◽  
Lalama Maria ◽  
Lindsay M. Tanner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Penile Prosthesis ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Combined Approach ◽  
Suspensory Ligament ◽  
Cosmetic Appearance ◽  
Buried Penis

Introduction: We present a case report on six patients who underwent a combined approach to improve the cosmetic appearance and functional performance of their buried penis. Aim: To report our combined approach to improve both buried penis and erectile dysfunction. Methods: In one surgery, we performed: a malleable penile prosthesis, ventral phalloplasty, and penile suspensory ligament release followed by a suprapubic lipectomy. Results: Postoperatively, all patients had an increase in penile length and were able to achieve successful penetrative intercourse. The average difference between the pre-operational and post-operational flaccid length of our six patients was 3.5 cm ± 1.38 (range, 1.9 to 5.08 cm). Conclusion: This case series serves as successful examples of using a combined approach in one stage to not only improve the cosmetic appearance of a buried penis but also address erectile dysfunction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document