Wearable sensors for foetal movement monitoring in low risk pregnancies

Author(s):  
Luís M. Borges ◽  
Norberto Barroca ◽  
Fernando J. Velez ◽  
J. Martinez-de-Oliveira ◽  
António S. Lebres
1985 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Florentin ◽  
G. F. Inbar ◽  
I. E. Timor-Tritsch

Author(s):  
Harish Chander ◽  
Reuben F. Burch ◽  
Purva Talegaonkar ◽  
David Saucier ◽  
Tony Luczak ◽  
...  

Wearable sensors are beneficial for continuous health monitoring, movement analysis, rehabilitation, evaluation of human performance, and for fall detection. Wearable stretch sensors are increasingly being used for human movement monitoring. Additionally, falls are one of the leading causes of both fatal and nonfatal injuries in the workplace. The use of wearable technology in the workplace could be a successful solution for human movement monitoring and fall detection, especially for high fall-risk occupations. This paper provides an in-depth review of different wearable stretch sensors and summarizes the need for wearable technology in the field of ergonomics and the current wearable devices used for fall detection. Additionally, the paper proposes the use of soft-robotic-stretch (SRS) sensors for human movement monitoring and fall detection. This paper also recapitulates the findings of a series of five published manuscripts from ongoing research that are published as Parts I to V of “Closing the Wearable Gap” journal articles that discuss the design and development of a foot and ankle wearable device using SRS sensors that can be used for fall detection. The use of SRS sensors in fall detection, its current limitations, and challenges for adoption in human factors and ergonomics are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 1019-1027
Author(s):  
Yuedong Xie ◽  
Zhigang Qu ◽  
Mingyang Lu ◽  
Wuliang Yin ◽  
Hanyang Xu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1944-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schwarz ◽  
Elizabeth C. Ward ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
Anne Coccetti ◽  
Pamela D'Netto ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the agreement between allied health assistants (AHAs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when completing dysphagia screening for low-risk referrals and at-risk patients under a delegation model and (b) the operational impact of this delegation model. Method All AHAs worked in the adult acute inpatient settings across three hospitals and completed training and competency evaluation prior to conducting independent screening. Screening (pass/fail) was based on results from pre-screening exclusionary questions in combination with a water swallow test and the Eating Assessment Tool. To examine the agreement of AHAs' decision making with SLPs, AHAs ( n = 7) and SLPs ( n = 8) conducted an independent, simultaneous dysphagia screening on 51 adult inpatients classified as low-risk/at-risk referrals. To examine operational impact, AHAs independently completed screening on 48 low-risk/at-risk patients, with subsequent clinical swallow evaluation conducted by an SLP with patients who failed screening. Results Exact agreement between AHAs and SLPs on overall pass/fail screening criteria for the first 51 patients was 100%. Exact agreement for the two tools was 100% for the Eating Assessment Tool and 96% for the water swallow test. In the operational impact phase ( n = 48), 58% of patients failed AHA screening, with only 10% false positives on subjective SLP assessment and nil identified false negatives. Conclusion AHAs demonstrated the ability to reliably conduct dysphagia screening on a cohort of low-risk patients, with a low rate of false negatives. Data support high level of agreement and positive operational impact of using trained AHAs to perform dysphagia screening in low-risk patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (15) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
ALICIA AULT
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (15) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  
Low Risk ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document