scholarly journals L-band scintillations and calibrated total electron content gradients over Brazil during the last solar maximum

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. A36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Cesaroni ◽  
Luca Spogli ◽  
Lucilla Alfonsi ◽  
Giorgiana De Franceschi ◽  
Luigi Ciraolo ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naufal Setiawan ◽  
Masato Furuya

AbstractThe split-spectrum method (SSM) can largely isolate and correct for the ionospheric contribution in the L-band interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). The standard SSM is performed on the assumption of only the first-order ionospheric dispersive effect, which is proportional to the total electron content (TEC). It is also known that during extreme atmospheric events, either originated from the ionosphere or in the troposphere, other dispersive effects do exist and potentially provide new insights into the dynamics of the atmosphere, but there have been few detection reports of such signals by InSAR. We apply L-band InSAR into heavy rain cases and examine the applicability and limitation of the standard SSM. Since no events such as earthquakes to cause surface deformation took place, the non-dispersive component is apparently attributable to the large amount of water vapor associated with heavy rain, whereas there are spotty anomalies in the dispersive component that are closely correlated with the heavy rain area. The ionosonde and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) rate of total electron content index (ROTI) map both show little anomalies during the heavy rain, which suggests few ionospheric disturbances. Therefore, we interpret that the spotty anomalies in the dispersive component of the standard SSM during heavy rain are originated in the troposphere. While we can consider two physical mechanisms, one is runaway electron avalanche and the other is the dispersive effect due to rain, comparison with the observations from the ground-based lightning detection network and rain gauge data, we conclude that the rain dispersive effect is spatiotemporally favorable. We further propose a formulation to examine if another dispersive phase than the first-order TEC effect is present and apply it to the heavy rain cases as well as two extreme ionospheric sporadic-E events. Our formulation successfully isolates the presence of another dispersive phase during heavy rain that is in positive correlation with the local rain rate. In comparison with other dispersive phases during Sporadic-E episodes, the dispersive heavy rain phases seem to have the same order of magnitude with the ionospheric higher order effects.


Radio Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Adewale ◽  
E. O. Oyeyemi ◽  
A. B. Adeloye ◽  
C. N. Mitchell ◽  
J. A. R. Rose ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naufal Setiawan ◽  
Masato Furuya

<p>The split-spectrum method (SSM) can largely isolate and correct for the ionospheric contribution in the L-band interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). The standard SSM is performed on the assumption of only the first-order ionospheric dispersive effect, which is proportional to the total electron content (TEC). It is also known that during extreme atmospheric events, either originated from the ionosphere or in the troposphere, other dispersive effects do exist and potentially provide new insights into the dynamics of the atmosphere, but there have been few detection reports of such signals by InSAR. We apply L-band InSAR into heavy rain cases and examine the applicability and limitation of the standard SSM. Since no events such as earthquakes to cause surface deformation took place, the non-dispersive component is apparently attributable to the large amount of water vapor associated with heavy rain, whereas there are spotty anomalies in the dispersive component that are closely correlated with the heavy rain area. The ionosonde and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) rate of total electron content index (ROTI) map both show little anomalies during the heavy rain, which suggests few ionospheric disturbances. Therefore, we interpret that the spotty anomalies in the dispersive component of the standard SSM during heavy rain are originated not in the ionosphere but the troposphere. While we can consider two physical mechanisms, one is runaway electron avalanche and the other is the scattering due to rain, comparison with the observations from the ground-based lightning detection network and rain gauge data, we conclude that the rain scattering interpretation is spatiotemporally favorable. We further propose a formulation to examine if another dispersive phase than the first-order TEC effect is present and apply it to the heavy rain cases as well as two extreme ionospheric sporadic-E events. Our formulation successfully isolates the presence of another dispersive phase during heavy rain that is in positive correlation with the local rain rate. Furthermore, our formulation is also able to detect the occurrence of higher-order ionospheric effects during Sporadic-E cases.</p>


Radio Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-534
Author(s):  
Yan Soldo ◽  
Liang Hong ◽  
Salem El-Nimri ◽  
David M. Le Vine

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemens Hocke ◽  
Huixin Liu ◽  
Nicholas Pedatella ◽  
Guanyi Ma

Abstract. We analyse reprocessed electron density profiles and total electron content (TEC) profiles of the ionosphere in September 2008 (around solar minimum) and September 2013 (around solar maximum) obtained by the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3). The TEC profiles describe the total electron content along the ray path from the GPS satellite to the low Earth orbit as function of the tangent point of the ray. Some of the profiles in the magnetic polar regions show small-scale fluctuations on spatial scales <50 km. Possibly the trajectory of the tangent point intersects spatial electron density irregularities in the magnetic polar region. For derivation of the morphology of the electron density and TEC fluctuations, a 50 km high-pass filter is applied in the s domain, where s is the distance between a reference point (bottom tangent point) and the tangent point. For each profile, the mean of the fluctuations is calculated for tangent point altitudes between 400 and 500 km. At first glance, the global maps of ΔNe and ΔTEC are quite similar. However, ΔTEC might be more reliable since it is based on fewer retrieval assumptions. We find a significant difference if the arithmetic mean or the median is applied to the global map of September 2013. In agreement with literature, ΔTEC is enhanced during the post-sunset rise of the equatorial ionosphere in September 2013, which is associated with spread F and equatorial plasma bubbles. The global map of ΔTEC at solar maximum (September 2013) has stronger fluctuations than those at solar minimum (September 2008). We obtained new results when we compare the global maps of the quiet phase and the storm phase of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012. It is evident that the TEC fluctuations are increased and extended over the southern magnetic polar region at the day of the geomagnetic storm. The north–south asymmetry of the storm response is more pronounced in the upper ionosphere (ray tangent points h = 400–500 km) than in the lower ionosphere (ray tangent points h = 200–300 km).


2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (5-8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariyam Jamilah Homam ◽  
Mohamad Aizat Ezri Ahmad Hapizudin

Variations in the Total Electron Content of the ionosphere were studied by utilizing data from the GISTM receiver installed at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. The study was conducted during periods of low solar activity (July 2007–July 2008) and high solar activity (July 2013–July 2014). Results show that the TEC are dependent on the solar activity.The values during high solar activity were significantly higher than that obtained during the solar minimum phase. The minimum TEC values for both phases varied between 89% and 97%, and the maximum TEC values varied between 70% and 81%. The pattern of daily TEC value changes was constant, and TEC peaked in the afternoon at ~14 LT. The highest TEC recorded during the solar maximum phase was 144.5 TEC Unit (TECU) in April 2014, whereas the highest TEC recorded during the solar minimum phase was 36.3 TECU in April 2008. TEC was maximized from March to May under both solar maximum and minimum phases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document