Mechanical testing of bioresorbable implants for use in metacarpal fracture fixation

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Bozic ◽  
Luis E. Perez ◽  
David R. Wilson ◽  
Peter G. Fitzgibbons ◽  
Jesse B. Jupiter
Author(s):  
Steven Higbee ◽  
Sharon Miller

Abstract Insufficient engineering analysis is a common weakness of student capstone design projects. Efforts made earlier in a curriculum to introduce analysis techniques should improve student confidence in applying these important skills toward design. To address student shortcomings in design, we implemented a new design project assignment for second-year undergraduate biomedical engineering students. The project involves the iterative design of a fracture fixation plate and is part of a broader effort to integrate relevant hands-on projects throughout our curriculum. Students are tasked with (1) using computer-aided design (CAD) software to make design changes to a fixation plate, (2) creating and executing finite element models to assess performance after each change, (3) iterating through three design changes, and (4) performing mechanical testing of the final device to verify model results. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess student knowledge, confidence, and achievement in design. Students exhibited design knowledge gains and cognizance of prior coursework knowledge integration into their designs. Further, students self-reported confidence gains in approaching design, working with hardware and software, and communicating results. Finally, student self-assessments exceeded instructor assessment of student design reports, indicating that students have significant room for growth as they progress through the curriculum. Beyond the gains observed in design knowledge, confidence, and achievement, the fracture fixation project described here builds student experience with CAD, finite element analysis, 3D printing, mechanical testing, and design communication. These skills contribute to the growing toolbox that students ultimately bring to capstone design.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e2298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna K. Steve ◽  
Christaan H. Schrag ◽  
Alice Kuo ◽  
A. Robertston Harrop

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Anil Malik ◽  
Parvesh Malik ◽  
Vijay Kumar Pandey ◽  
Dev Jyoti Sharma ◽  
Kumar Pushkar

Background: Different methods are in use for fixation of metacarpal fractures. Krischener wire and titanium miniplates are most commonly used methods. Both these methods require special & sophisticated instruments. In this study, we have used a dental wire in circumosseous fashion to fix the metacarpal fractures.Methods: In the study, we included all the fracture of metacarpals with operative indication. K-wire, minilplate system and circumosseous dental wire methods were used randomly.Results: The results were compared in term of immediate post-operative complications & functional recovery in form of ability of fist formation at 06 weeks. All the three methods were found comparable, in fact in this study the results of fractures treated with circumosseous wiring were appreciable and significantly better.Conclusions: Circumossoeus use of dental wire can be an alternate method of metacarpal fracture fixation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document