Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors: a pilot study

Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (06) ◽  
pp. 560-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Ming Zhang ◽  
Ning Zhong ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Chang-Qing Li ◽  
Rui Ji ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The diagnostic yield of current techniques for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) is suboptimal. This prospective study aimed to develop diagnostic criteria for needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) of gastric SETs, and to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, feasibility, and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided nCLE (EUS-nCLE). Methods Eligible patients were prospectively recruited to undergo EUS-nCLE. Four unblinded investigators evaluated nCLE videos and corresponding histopathology to develop the nCLE criteria. The recorded nCLE videos were reviewed off-line by one endoscopist 3 months later. Image quality (five-point scale, 1 = poor and 5 = very good) and the interobserver agreements were assessed. Results All 33 patients underwent successful EUS-nCLE procedures. The nCLE criteria for gastric SETs were established. Overall accuracy of off-line nCLE was significantly higher than that of EUS alone (87.9 % vs. 63.6 %; P = 0.02). The mean image quality score was 3.9. The kappa values of the interobserver agreements were 0.66 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor, 0.89 for ectopic pancreas, 0.58 for leiomyoma, and 0.72 for carcinoma. Conclusions EUS-nCLE was feasible and safe to accurately diagnose gastric SETs.

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. E17-E23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradermchai Kongkam ◽  
Rapat Pittayanon ◽  
Pichet Sampatanukul ◽  
Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon ◽  
Satimai Aniwan ◽  
...  

Pancreas ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Gásdal Karstensen ◽  
Tatiana Cârţână ◽  
Pia Helene Klausen ◽  
Hazem Hassan ◽  
Carmen Florina Popescu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. E165-E171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schlag ◽  
Christoph Menzel ◽  
Manuela Götzberger ◽  
Simon Nennstiel ◽  
Peter Klare ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims The optimal approach to small subepithelial tumors (SETs) of the upper gastrointestinal tract remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for less invasive tissue sampling of small SETs of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Patients and methods In this prospective observational study patients with small ( ≤ 3 cm) SETs of the upper gastrointestinal tract were eligible and underwent EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle. The main outcome measure was the diagnostic yield. The number of obtained core biopsies was also assessed. Results Twenty patients were included. The mean SET size was 16 mm (range 10 – 27 mm). EUS-FNB was technically feasible in all cases and no complications were observed. The diagnostic yield was 75 %. Core biopsy specimens were obtained in only 25 % of cases. Conclusion EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle of small SETs can achieve a definite diagnosis in the majority of cases. However, because core samples cannot regularly be obtained, EUS-FNB seems not to be convincingly superior to standard EUS-FNA in this setting


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanawin Wong ◽  
Tanawat Pattarapuntakul ◽  
Nisa Netinatsuton ◽  
Bancha Ovartlarnporn ◽  
Jaksin Sottisuporn ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is an established diagnostic procedure for solid pancreatic mass. However, the diagnostic yield between fineneedle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic yields between FNA and FNB using conventional FNA and Franseen needles of the same size (22 gauge), respectively, in patients with solid pancreatic mass who underwent EUS-TA without rapid onsite cytopathology evaluation (ROSE). Methods: All cases of EUS-TA by FNA or FNB for solid pancreatic mass between January 2017 and October 2020 in a single center university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The procedure was performed without an onsite cytologist. After macroscopic onsite evaluation (MOSE), the endoscopist finished the procedure. The diagnostic yield and the average number of needle passes between FNB and FNA were then compared. Results: A total of 151 patients (FNA, n = 77; FNB, n = 74) with solid pancreatic mass detected by cross-sectional imaging underwent EUS-TA. The mean age was 62.3 ± 12.8 years, with 88 (58.3%) males. Age, gender, mass location, tumour size and disease stage from imaging were not significantly different. The diagnostic performance was dramatically higher in EUS-FNB (100%) than in EUS-FNA (89.6%). The mean number of needle passes was clearly fewer in FNB than FNA (2.8 vs. 3.8, p < 0.001). The total procedure time was less in FNB (34.7 minutes) than in FNA (41 minutes). The adverse event rate between FNB and FNA was not significantly different. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE was significantly higher in FNB than in FNA. The number of needle passes and the total procedure time was also lesser in FNB.


Endoscopy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 892-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Giovannini ◽  
Fabrice Caillol ◽  
Geneviève Monges ◽  
Flora Poizat ◽  
Anne-Isabelle Lemaistre ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document