single-vessel double anastomosis (SVDA) double anastomosis 13 Double Anastomosis Using Only One Branch of the Superficial Temporal Artery: Single-Vessel Double Anastomosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory D Arnone ◽  
Ziad A Hage ◽  
Fady T Charbel

AbstractBACKGROUNDA double anastomosis using a single superficial temporal artery (STA) donor branch for both a proximal side-to-side (S2S) and a distal end-to-side anastomosis is a novel direct bypass technique for use in selected patients necessitating flow augmentation.OBJECTIVETo describe the single-vessel double anastomosis (SVDA) technique, including its indications, advantages, and limitations, in addition to reporting our cases series of patients who underwent a SVDA bypass surgery.METHODSPatients undergoing a SVDA bypass at a single institution between January 2010 and February 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative flow data was collected, including STA cut-flow, bypass flows, and cut flow index (CFI). Bypass patency was assessed by cerebral angiography and quantitative magnetic resonance angiography with noninvasive optimal vessel analysis. Adverse events occurring during the hospital stay and clinical status at last follow up was recorded.RESULTSSeven patients underwent SVDA bypass. Mean follow-up was 14.5 mo. Initial CFI for the S2S bypasses averaged 0.56 ± 0.25 and CFI after the SVDA averaged 1.15 ± 0.24. There was a statistically significant average difference in CFI before and after the SVDA bypass (p < .013). Thirteen bypasses (93%) were patent postoperatively, and remained patent at last follow up. Four patients experienced various postoperative complications. None of the patients had a new stroke since hospital discharge.CONCLUSIONSVDA is a novel technique that can be advantageous for selected cases of extracranial-to-intracranial bypass. Expertise in bypass procedures is a necessary prerequisite. Graft patency rates and complications appear comparable to other bypass techniques.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Tashiro ◽  
Miki Fujimura ◽  
Masahito Katsuki ◽  
Taketo Nishizawa ◽  
Yasutake Tomata ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVESuperficial temporal artery–middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) anastomosis is the standard surgical management for moyamoya disease (MMD), whereas cerebral hyperperfusion (CHP) is one of the potential complications of this procedure that can result in delayed intracerebral hemorrhage and/or neurological deterioration. Recent advances in perioperative management in the early postoperative period have significantly reduced the risk of CHP syndrome, but delayed intracerebral hemorrhage and prolonged/delayed CHP are still major clinical issues. The clinical implication of RNF213 gene polymorphism c.14576G>A (rs112735431), a susceptibility variant for MMD, includes early disease onset and a more severe form of MMD, but its significance in perioperative pathology is unknown. Thus, the authors investigated the role of RNF213 polymorphism in perioperative hemodynamics after STA-MCA anastomosis for MMD.METHODSAmong 96 consecutive adult patients with MMD comprising 105 hemispheres who underwent serial quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) analysis by N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine SPECT after STA-MCA anastomosis, 66 patients consented to genetic analysis of RNF213. Patients were routinely maintained under strict blood pressure control during and after surgery. The local CBF values were quantified at the vascular territory supplied by the bypass on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 7. The authors defined the radiological CHP phenomenon as a local CBF increase of more than 150% compared with the preoperative values, and then they investigated the correlation between RNF213 polymorphism and the development of CHP.RESULTSCHP at POD 1 was observed in 23 hemispheres (23/73 hemispheres [31.5%]), and its incidence was not statistically different between groups (15/41 [36.6%] in RNF213-mutant group vs 8/32 [25.0%] in RNF213–wild type (WT) group; p = 0.321). CHP on POD 7, which is a relatively late period of the CHP phenomenon in MMD, was evident in 9 patients (9/73 hemispheres [12.3%]) after STA-MCA anastomosis. This prolonged/delayed CHP was exclusively observed in the RNF213-mutant group (9/41 [22.0%] in the RNF213-mutant group vs 0/32 [0.0%] in the RNF213-WT group; p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that RNF213 polymorphism was significantly associated with CBF increase on POD 7 (OR 5.47, 95% CI 1.06–28.35; p = 0.043).CONCLUSIONSProlonged/delayed CHP after revascularization surgery was exclusively found in the RNF213-mutant group. Although the exact mechanism underlying the contribution of RNF213 polymorphism to the prolonged/delayed CBF increase in patients with MMD is unclear, the current study suggests that genetic analysis of RNF213 is useful for predicting the perioperative pathology of patients with MMD.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1989 ◽  
pp. 480
Author(s):  
D Locatelli ◽  
A Messina ◽  
P Paoletti ◽  
S Pezzotta

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickalus R Khan ◽  
Jacques J Morcos

Abstract We present the case of a 34-yr-old male who suffered repeated ischemic events resulting in right-sided weakness. He was found to have left M1 segment near occlusion on angiography with a large area of uncompensated hypoperfusion. The patient underwent a direct superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass. Direct bypass in the acute setting of ischemia has been previously described.1-5 Moyamoya ischemic disease can be treated with either direct or indirect surgical revascularization. There have been several techniques developed for direct bypasses in moyamoya ischemic disease. These include the standard 1-donor 1-recipient (1D1R) end-to-side (ES) bypass, the “double-barrel” 2-donor 2-recipient (2D2R) ES bypass, and the more recently developed 1-donor 2-recipient (1D2R)6,7 utilizing both an ES and a side-to-side (SS) bypass with a 1-donor vessel. The case presentation, surgical anatomy, decision-making, operative nuances, and postoperative course and outcome are reviewed. The patient gave verbal consent for participating in the procedure and surgical video.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Juan‐Carpena ◽  
Juan Carlos Palazón‐Cabanes ◽  
José Ignacio Gallego‐León ◽  
María Niveiro ◽  
Isabel Betlloch‐Más

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document