The Neural Correlates of Semantic Feature Analysis in Chronic Aphasia: Discordant Patterns According to the Etiology

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 052-063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine Marcotte ◽  
Ana Ansaldo
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 39-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine Marcotte ◽  
Daniel Adrover-Roig ◽  
Brigitte Damien ◽  
Mathilde de Préaumont ◽  
Suzanne Généreux ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Hula ◽  
Juan Fernandez-Miranda ◽  
Fang-Cheng Yeh ◽  
David Fernandes-Cabral ◽  
Michael Dickey ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 206-207
Author(s):  
Karine Marcotte ◽  
Paolo Vitali ◽  
Ana Paula Delgado ◽  
Ana Inés Ansaldo

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 4464-4482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane L. Kendall ◽  
Megan Oelke Moldestad ◽  
Wesley Allen ◽  
Janaki Torrence ◽  
Stephen E. Nadeau

Purpose The ultimate goal of anomia treatment should be to achieve gains in exemplars trained in the therapy session, as well as generalization to untrained exemplars and contexts. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of phonomotor treatment, a treatment focusing on enhancement of phonological sequence knowledge, against semantic feature analysis (SFA), a lexical-semantic therapy that focuses on enhancement of semantic knowledge and is well known and commonly used to treat anomia in aphasia. Method In a between-groups randomized controlled trial, 58 persons with aphasia characterized by anomia and phonological dysfunction were randomized to receive 56–60 hr of intensively delivered treatment over 6 weeks with testing pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3 months posttreatment termination. Results There was no significant between-groups difference on the primary outcome measure (untrained nouns phonologically and semantically unrelated to each treatment) at 3 months posttreatment. Significant within-group immediately posttreatment acquisition effects for confrontation naming and response latency were observed for both groups. Treatment-specific generalization effects for confrontation naming were observed for both groups immediately and 3 months posttreatment; a significant decrease in response latency was observed at both time points for the SFA group only. Finally, significant within-group differences on the Comprehensive Aphasia Test–Disability Questionnaire ( Swinburn, Porter, & Howard, 2004 ) were observed both immediately and 3 months posttreatment for the SFA group, and significant within-group differences on the Functional Outcome Questionnaire ( Glueckauf et al., 2003 ) were found for both treatment groups 3 months posttreatment. Discussion Our results are consistent with those of prior studies that have shown that SFA treatment and phonomotor treatment generalize to untrained words that share features (semantic or phonological sequence, respectively) with the training set. However, they show that there is no significant generalization to untrained words that do not share semantic features or phonological sequence features.


2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-148
Author(s):  
A.Susan Gay ◽  
Charlotte J. Keith

Have you heard of or used semantic feature analysis? It is a literacy strategy that can help students determine relationships among related vocabulary terms (Cooter and Flynt 1996). In mathematics classrooms, the use of semantic feature analysis is relatively new.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document